Literature DB >> 8557081

Effect of changes in processing to improve hygiene control on contamination of poultry carcasses with campylobacter.

G C Mead1, W R Hudson, M H Hinton.   

Abstract

Examination of neck skin and caecal samples taken at a commercial processing plant from 15 randomly chosen poultry flocks showed that all flocks were contaminated initially with thermophilic Campylobacter spp., even in the apparent absence of caecal carriage. During processing, numbers of campylobacter on skin samples were reduced by between 10 and 1000-fold. To improve hygiene control generally, chlorinated-water sprays were used to limit microbial contamination on equipment and working surfaces. In addition, chlorine concentrations in process water were increased and any unnecessary carcass contact surfaces in the processing plant were removed. When comparing flocks before and after the changes, it was found that numbers of campylobacter on packaged carcasses were significantly lower after the changes had been made (P 0.001). In practice, however, the reduction would be likely to have little impact on consumer exposure to campylobacter infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8557081      PMCID: PMC2271579          DOI: 10.1017/s0950268800058659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Infect        ISSN: 0950-2688            Impact factor:   2.451


  11 in total

1.  Microbiological survey of five poultry processing plants in the UK.

Authors:  G C Mead; W R Hudson; M H Hinton
Journal:  Br Poult Sci       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.095

2.  Handling raw chicken as a source for sporadic Campylobacter jejuni infections.

Authors:  R S Hopkins; A S Scott
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Use of a marker organism in poultry processing to identify sites of cross-contamination and evaluate possible control measures.

Authors:  G C Mead; W R Hudson; M H Hinton
Journal:  Br Poult Sci       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.095

Review 4.  Epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni infections.

Authors:  M J Blaser; D N Taylor; R A Feldman
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  An outbreak of presumptive food-borne campylobacter enteritis.

Authors:  M B Skirrow; R G Fidoe; D M Jones
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 6.072

6.  Study on the epidemiology and control of Campylobacter jejuni in poultry broiler flocks.

Authors:  A van de Giessen; S I Mazurier; W Jacobs-Reitsma; W Jansen; P Berkers; W Ritmeester; K Wernars
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Distribution and numbers of Campylobacter in newly slaughtered broiler chickens and hens.

Authors:  E Berndtson; M Tivemo; A Engvall
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.277

8.  The role of poultry and meats in the etiology of Campylobacter jejuni/coli enteritis.

Authors:  N V Harris; N S Weiss; C M Nolan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in two California chicken processing plants.

Authors:  J M Wempe; C A Genigeorgis; T B Farver; H I Yusufu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  The colonization of broiler chickens with Campylobacter jejuni: some epidemiological investigations.

Authors:  T J Humphrey; A Henley; D G Lanning
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.451

View more
  14 in total

1.  Impact of transport crate reuse and of catching and processing on Campylobacter and Salmonella contamination of broiler chickens.

Authors:  J Slader; G Domingue; F Jørgensen; K McAlpine; R J Owen; F J Bolton; T J Humphrey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Phenotypic and genotypic characterizations of Campylobacter jejuni isolated from the broiler meat production process.

Authors:  Eglė Kudirkienė; Marianne Thorup Cohn; Richard A Stabler; Philippa C R Strong; Loreta Sernienė; Brendan W Wren; Eva Møller Nielsen; Mindaugas Malakauskas; Lone Brøndsted
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Changes in the carriage of Campylobacter strains by poultry carcasses during processing in abattoirs.

Authors:  D G Newell; J E Shreeve; M Toszeghy; G Domingue; S Bull; T Humphrey; G Mead
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Molecular subtype analyses of Campylobacter spp. from Arkansas and California poultry operations.

Authors:  K L Hiett; N J Stern; P Fedorka-Cray; N A Cox; M T Musgrove; S Ladely
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Genotypic Diversity among Campylobacter jejuni Isolates in a Commercial Broiler Flock.

Authors:  L M Thomas; K A Long; R T Good; M Panaccio; P R Widders
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Application of host-specific bacteriophages to the surface of chicken skin leads to a reduction in recovery of Campylobacter jejuni.

Authors:  Robert J Atterbury; Phillippa L Connerton; Christine E R Dodd; Catherine E D Rees; Ian F Connerton
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Effect of Campylobacter-specific maternal antibodies on Campylobacter jejuni colonization in young chickens.

Authors:  Orhan Sahin; Naidan Luo; Shouxiong Huang; Qijing Zhang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Reduction of experimental Salmonella and Campylobacter contamination of chicken skin by application of lytic bacteriophages.

Authors:  D Goode; V M Allen; P A Barrow
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Campylobacter spp. as a Foodborne Pathogen: A Review.

Authors:  Joana Silva; Daniela Leite; Mariana Fernandes; Cristina Mena; Paul Anthony Gibbs; Paula Teixeira
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Production of organic acids by probiotic lactobacilli can be used to reduce pathogen load in poultry.

Authors:  Jason M Neal-McKinney; Xiaonan Lu; Tri Duong; Charles L Larson; Douglas R Call; Devendra H Shah; Michael E Konkel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.