Literature DB >> 12450847

Molecular subtype analyses of Campylobacter spp. from Arkansas and California poultry operations.

K L Hiett1, N J Stern, P Fedorka-Cray, N A Cox, M T Musgrove, S Ladely.   

Abstract

Campylobacter isolates from diverse samples within broiler production and processing environments were typed by using flaA short variable region DNA sequence analysis. Sixteen flocks from four different farms representing two broiler producers in Arkansas and California were analyzed. Fourteen of the flocks (87.5%) were Campylobacter-positive; two remained negative throughout the 6-week rearing period. In general, multiple clones were present within a flock. Additionally, clones found within a flock were also present on the final product, although the diversity of Campylobacter spp. on the final product appeared to be reduced relative to that observed within the flock. Comparison of clones between flocks on the same farm revealed that some clones of Campylobacter persisted in multiple flocks. Furthermore, some clones were identified across the two farms that were under the same management. In two sampling periods, environmental isolates were positive for Campylobacter prior to flock shedding. Environmental samples associated with five additional flocks were positive for Campylobacter concomitantly with recovery of Campylobacter from the birds. Analysis of the environmental isolates that were positive prior to flock shedding demonstrated that in some instances the environmental isolates possessed genotypes identical to those of isolates originating from the flock, while in other cases the environmental isolates possessed genotypes that were distantly related to isolates obtained from the flock. Analyses of environmental isolates that tested positive concurrently with the positive isolates from the flocks demonstrated varied results; in some instances the environmental isolates possessed genotypes identical to those of isolates originating from the flock, while in other cases the environmental isolates possessed genotypes that were distantly related to isolates obtained from the flock. These data suggest that the external environment may contribute to Campylobacter contamination during poultry production and processing. However, environmental contamination with Campylobacter does not appear to be the sole contributing factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12450847      PMCID: PMC134383          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.12.6220-6236.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  27 in total

1.  Distribution of Campylobacter spp. in selected U.S. poultry production and processing operations.

Authors:  N J Stern; P Fedorka-Cray; J S Bailey; N A Cox; S E Craven; K L Hiett; M T Musgrove; S Ladely; D Cosby; G C Mead
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.077

2.  Direct polymerase chain reaction detection of Campylobacter spp. in poultry hatchery samples.

Authors:  Kelli L Hiett; Nelson A Cox; Norman J Stern
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  2002 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.577

Review 3.  Aspects of epidemiology of Campylobacter in poultry.

Authors:  W F Jacobs-Reitsma
Journal:  Vet Q       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.320

Review 4.  Campylobacter enteritis.

Authors:  J P Butzler; M B Skirrow
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1979-09

Review 5.  Campylobacter enteritis.

Authors:  M J Blaser; L B Reller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Incidence of Campylobacter jejuni in fresh eviscerated whole market chickens.

Authors:  C E Park; Z K Stankiewicz; J Lovett; J Hunt
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Changes in the carriage of Campylobacter strains by poultry carcasses during processing in abattoirs.

Authors:  D G Newell; J E Shreeve; M Toszeghy; G Domingue; S Bull; T Humphrey; G Mead
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Discrimination of Campylobacter jejuni isolates by fla gene sequencing.

Authors:  R J Meinersmann; L O Helsel; P I Fields; K L Hiett
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Identification of a new source of Campylobacter contamination in poultry: transmission from breeder hens to broiler chickens.

Authors:  Nelson A Cox; Norman J Stern; Kelli L Hiett; Mark E Berrang
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  2002 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.577

10.  Sampling of broiler carcasses for Salmonella with low volume water rinse.

Authors:  N A Cox; J E Thomson; J S Bailey
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Sources of Campylobacter colonization in broiler chickens.

Authors:  D G Newell; C Fearnley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Biosecurity-based interventions and strategies to reduce Campylobacter spp. on poultry farms.

Authors:  D G Newell; K T Elvers; D Dopfer; I Hansson; P Jones; S James; J Gittins; N J Stern; R Davies; I Connerton; D Pearson; G Salvat; V M Allen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Presence of Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. in wild small mammals on organic farms.

Authors:  B G Meerburg; W F Jacobs-Reitsma; J A Wagenaar; A Kijlstra
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Sources of Campylobacter spp. colonizing housed broiler flocks during rearing.

Authors:  S A Bull; V M Allen; G Domingue; F Jørgensen; J A Frost; R Ure; R Whyte; D Tinker; J E L Corry; J Gillard-King; T J Humphrey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Distribution and ecology of campylobacters in coastal plain streams (Georgia, United States of America).

Authors:  Ethell Vereen; R Richard Lowrance; Dana J Cole; Erin K Lipp
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Broiler Campylobacter contamination and human campylobacteriosis in Iceland.

Authors:  Kenneth A Callicott; Hjördís Harğardóttir; Franklín Georgsson; Jarle Reiersen; Vala Friğriksdóttir; Eggert Gunnarsson; Pascal Michel; Jean-Robert Bisaillon; Karl G Kristinsson; Haraldur Briem; Kelli L Hiett; David S Needleman; Norman J Stern
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Differentiation of campylobacter populations as demonstrated by flagellin short variable region sequences.

Authors:  Richard J Meinersmann; Robert W Phillips; Kelli L Hiett; Paula Fedorka-Cray
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Real-time PCR approach for detection of environmental sources of Campylobacter strains colonizing broiler flocks.

Authors:  Anne M Ridley; Vivien M Allen; Meenaxi Sharma; Jill A Harris; Diane G Newell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Longitudinal study of Campylobacter jejuni bacteriophages and their hosts from broiler chickens.

Authors:  P L Connerton; C M Loc Carrillo; C Swift; E Dillon; A Scott; C E D Rees; C E R Dodd; J Frost; I F Connerton
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Development of a strain-specific molecular method for quantitating individual campylobacter strains in mixed populations.

Authors:  Karen T Elvers; Christopher R Helps; Trudy M Wassenaar; Vivien M Allen; Diane G Newell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.