Literature DB >> 8557048

Comparison of protein binding to DNA in vivo and in vitro: defining an effective intracellular target.

S W Yang1, H A Nash.   

Abstract

We have quantitatively evaluated the affinity of a set of target sites for the integration host factor (IHF) protein of Escherichia coli by their performance as competitors in an electrophoretic mobility shift assay. We also determined how well each of these sites is filled by IHF in vivo. The data show that several natural sites have an affinity not much greater than that required for intracellular occupancy. The data also indicate that very little of the IHF in a cell is present as free protein available for binding, suggesting that binding to non-specific targets dominates the operation of this system. The correlation between in vitro affinity and in vivo occupancy provides a ready means to assess the likely physiological significance of putative IHF sites. It also provides a general method to assess the importance of non-specific interactions by DNA binding proteins inside a cell.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8557048      PMCID: PMC394753          DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00319.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  39 in total

1.  The general affinity of lac repressor for E. coli DNA: implications for gene regulation in procaryotes and eucaryotes.

Authors:  S Lin; A D Riggs
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  The interaction of recombination proteins with supercoiled DNA: defining the role of supercoiling in lambda integrative recombination.

Authors:  E Richet; P Abcarian; H A Nash
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1986-09-26       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Non-specific DNA binding of genome regulating proteins as a biological control mechanism: I. The lac operon: equilibrium aspects.

Authors:  P H von Hippel; A Revzin; C A Gross; A C Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Growth phase variation of integration host factor level in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  M D Ditto; D Roberts; R A Weisberg
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  E. coli integration host factor binds to specific sites in DNA.

Authors:  N L Craig; H A Nash
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Intracellular location of catabolite activator protein of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  D I Cook; A Revzin
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Calculating the dissociation constant of an unlabeled compound from the concentration required to displace radiolabel binding by 50%.

Authors:  J Linden
Journal:  J Cyclic Nucleotide Res       Date:  1982

8.  Sequencing end-labeled DNA with base-specific chemical cleavages.

Authors:  A M Maxam; W Gilbert
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.600

9.  Relationship between the inhibition constant (K1) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction.

Authors:  Y Cheng; W H Prusoff
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1973-12-01       Impact factor: 5.858

10.  Kinetics and mechanism in the reaction of gene regulatory proteins with DNA.

Authors:  M G Fried; D M Crothers
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1984-01-25       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  29 in total

1.  Tn10 transpososome assembly involves a folded intermediate that must be unfolded for target capture and strand transfer.

Authors:  J S Sakai; N Kleckner; X Yang; A Guhathakurta
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  A comparison of in vivo and in vitro DNA-binding specificities suggests a new model for homeoprotein DNA binding in Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  A Carr; M D Biggin
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Compaction of single DNA molecules induced by binding of integration host factor (IHF).

Authors:  B M Ali; R Amit; I Braslavsky; A B Oppenheim; O Gileadi; J Stavans
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  In vitro selection of integration host factor binding sites.

Authors:  S D Goodman; N J Velten; Q Gao; S Robinson; A M Segall
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Flexible DNA bending in HU-DNA cocrystal structures.

Authors:  Kerren K Swinger; Kathryn M Lemberg; Ying Zhang; Phoebe A Rice
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Transcription from fusion promoters generated during transposition of transposon Tn4652 is positively affected by integration host factor in Pseudomonas putida.

Authors:  R Teras; R Hõrak; M Kivisaar
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Stepwise binding and bending of DNA by Escherichia coli integration host factor.

Authors:  Sawako Sugimura; Donald M Crothers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Structure-based analysis of HU-DNA binding.

Authors:  Kerren K Swinger; Phoebe A Rice
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  TraY and integration host factor oriT binding sites and F conjugal transfer: sequence variations, but not altered spacing, are tolerated.

Authors:  Sarah L Williams; Joel F Schildbach
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Activation of site-specific DNA integration in human cells by a single chain integration host factor.

Authors:  Teresa Corona; Qiuye Bao; Nicole Christ; Thomas Schwartz; Jinming Li; Peter Dröge
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.