Literature DB >> 8554926

Prediction of thoracic and lumbar vertebral body compressive strength: correlations with bone mineral density and vertebral region.

K Singer1, S Edmondston, R Day, P Breidahl, R Price.   

Abstract

The bone density of thoracolumbar vertebral columns (T1 to L5) from 18 individuals was measured using quantitative computed tomography and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Three hundred six isolated vertebral bodies were tested in a materials test device to determine their compressive strength. Between T1 and L5 the mean segmental increase in bone mineral content was 0.3 g, while the corresponding mean decrease in trabecular density was 4.7 HU. Midvertebral body cross-sectional area increased by an average of 46 mm2 per segment and the mean segmental increase in compressive strength was 0.17 kN. Compressive strength was significantly correlated with bone mineral density measured with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (r = 0.86). Vertebral trabecular density samples measured with quantitative computed tomography were poorly correlated with compressive strength (r = 0.28); however, this was improved when the trabecular density was multiplied by the midvertebral body cross-sectional area (r = 0.83). This study provides information concerning the relationships between density and mechanical properties of all thoracic and lumbar vertebral bodies across a wide age range. While the load-bearing capacity of the vertebral bodies is largely dependent on their geometry and bone density, this relationship has been only extensively tested for the lumbar spine. This study extends these observations over the lumbar and thoracic regions to provide a comprehensive analysis of the strength characteristics of each vertebral body. This is particularly important given the paucity of data on the thoracic spine where age-related vertebral fractures predominate. These data provide a basis for the development of models to predict the potential for thoracolumbar fractures in the elderly vertebral column.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8554926     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(95)00165-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  36 in total

1.  Transmission of force in the lumbosacral spine during backward falls.

Authors:  Carolyn Van Toen; Meena M Sran; Stephen N Robinovitch; Peter A Cripton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  An investigation of thoracic and lumbar cancellous vertebral architecture using power-spectral analysis of plain radiographs.

Authors:  A M Buck; R I Price; I M Sweetman; C E Oxnard
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Three-dimensional texture analysis of cancellous bone cores evaluated at clinical CT resolutions.

Authors:  Chad Showalter; Bradley D Clymer; Bradford Richmond; Kimerly Powell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-09-17       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  The vertebral fracture cascade in osteoporosis: a review of aetiopathogenesis.

Authors:  A M Briggs; A M Greig; J D Wark
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Paraspinal muscle control in people with osteoporotic vertebral fracture.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Alison M Greig; Kim L Bennell; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Biomechanics of side impact: injury criteria, aging occupants, and airbag technology.

Authors:  Narayan Yoganandan; Frank A Pintar; Brian D Stemper; Thomas A Gennarelli; John A Weigelt
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Variation of trabecular microarchitectural parameters in cranial, caudal and mid-vertebral regions of the ovine L3 vertebra.

Authors:  Oran D Kennedy; Orlaith Brennan; Susan M Rackard; Fergal J O'Brien; David Taylor; T Clive Lee
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Role of trabecular microarchitecture in whole-vertebral body biomechanical behavior.

Authors:  Aaron J Fields; Senthil K Eswaran; Michael G Jekir; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Comparison of quantitative computed tomography-based measures in predicting vertebral compressive strength.

Authors:  Jenni M Buckley; Kenneth Loo; Julie Motherway
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  The effect of osteoporotic vertebral fracture on predicted spinal loads in vivo.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Tim V Wrigley; Jaap H van Dieën; Bev Phillips; Sing Kai Lo; Alison M Greig; Kim L Bennell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.