Literature DB >> 8550935

Phonemic resetting versus postural adjustments in the speech of cochlear implant users: an exploration of voice-onset time.

H Lane1, J Wozniak, M Matthies, M Svirsky, J Perkell.   

Abstract

Voice-onset time (VOT) was measured in plosive-initial syllables uttered by five cochlear implant users prior to and repeatedly at intervals after activation of their speech processors. In "short-term" experiments, the elicitation set was read after the subject's processor has been off for 24 h, then turned on them off again. Four out of five implant users increased voiceless and/or voiced VOTc (VOT corrected for changes in syllable duration) from preimplant baselines to final recordings made 1-3 years later. Measured acoustic correlates of speech "posture" (average SPL, F0, and low-frequency spectral slope) changed concurrently. Results in the short-term study were largely consistent with the long term. Significant multiple regressions relating changes in VOTc to accompanying changes in postural correlates were found in both studies. This outcome is consistent with hypotheses that predict changes in both VOTc and in postural correlates with the restoration of some hearing and that allow for linkages between the two. Some of the reliable VOTc increases obtained over the long term that were not correlated with postural changes may have been caused directly by auditory validation of articulatory/acoustic relations that underlie synergisms for phoneme production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8550935     DOI: 10.1121/1.413798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  6 in total

1.  Perception and production of /r/ allophones improve with hearing from a cochlear implant.

Authors:  Melanie L Matthies; Frank H Guenther; Margaret Denny; Joseph S Perkell; Ellen Burton; Jennell Vick; Harlan Lane; Mark Tiede; Majid Zandipour
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Gradual adaptation to auditory frequency mismatch.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Thomas M Talavage; Shivank Sinha; Heidi Neuburger; Mahan Azadpour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Strength of German accent under altered auditory feedback.

Authors:  P Howell; K Dworzynski
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-04

4.  Strength of British English accents in altered listening conditions.

Authors:  Peter Howell; William Barry; David Vinson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-01

5.  Real-time feedback control of voice in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Anirudh Gautam; Jason A Brant; Michael J Ruckenstein; Steven J Eliades
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-11-21

6.  Sensorimotor adaptation of voice fundamental frequency in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Defne Abur; Rosemary A Lester-Smith; Ayoub Daliri; Ashling A Lupiani; Frank H Guenther; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.