Literature DB >> 8542565

Effectiveness of notification and group education in modifying prescribing of regulated analgesics.

J F Anderson1, K L McEwan, W P Hrudey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of group education and notification with that of notification alone in modifying prescribing of regulated analgesics.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial conducted from Dec. 1, 1992, to Dec. 31, 1993.
SETTING: Nonacademic primary care practices in British Columbia. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-four physicians randomly selected from a group of 100 physicians who had written a number of prescriptions for regulated drugs more than than two standard deviations above the mean number of prescriptions written for such drugs in 1992. Any physician who was unable to participate was replaced from the original group of 100 before the study began. Five subjects did not complete the study and were not included in the analysis.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to three groups: those in the first group received a written notification of excessive prescribing and attended a 1-day group-education activity, those in the second group received a written notification of excessive prescribing only and those in the third group were not subject to any intervention and were unaware that their prescribing had received special notice. OUTCOME MEASURE: Mean number of prescriptions for regulated analgesics issued per physician in the 6 months before and the 6 months after the interventions.
RESULTS: Physicians in the group that attended the education intervention wrote, on average, 33% fewer prescriptions after the intervention, whereas physicians in the group that received only written notification wrote 25% fewer prescriptions, on average, after the intervention. No change in prescribing was shown in the control group. The differences in rates of prescribing of regulated analgesics between each intervention group and the control group were statistically significant (p < 0.01). The difference in the rate of prescribing between the two intervention groups was not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Group education and notification of prescriber status as well as notification alone significantly reduced prescribing of regulated analgesics. Hence, feedback on a physician's prescribing pattern may be a practical and less costly alternative to direct educational intervention in moderating the prescribing of regulated analgesics. The results do not, however, imply that notification is as effective as education in improving overall patient care. A follow-up study comparing the duration of the effect of the educational intervention with that of notification alone is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8542565      PMCID: PMC1488091     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  25 in total

1.  Principles of educational outreach ('academic detailing') to improve clinical decision making.

Authors:  S B Soumerai; J Avorn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-01-26       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Will your prescribing habits cost your license?

Authors:  D M Long
Journal:  Md Med J       Date:  1988-02

3.  Persistence of improvement in antibiotic prescribing in office practice.

Authors:  W A Ray; W Schaffner; C F Federspiel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985 Mar 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Chemical interventions for pain.

Authors:  G M Aronoff; J M Wagner; A S Spangler
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1986-12

5.  Reducing polypharmacy in the elderly. A controlled trial of physician feedback.

Authors:  K Kroenke; E M Pinholt
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Improving drug prescribing in a primary care practice.

Authors:  S H Gehlbach; W E Wilkinson; W E Hammond; N E Clapp; A L Finn; W J Taylor; M S Rodell
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Improving antibiotic prescribing in office practice. A controlled trial of three educational methods.

Authors:  W Schaffner; W A Ray; C F Federspiel; W O Miller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-10-07       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The chronic pain syndrome: misconceptions and management.

Authors:  J B Reuler; D E Girard; D A Nardone
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Chronic low back pain. The team approach.

Authors:  D M Spengler
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Effect of an educational intervention on oral cephalosporin use in primary care.

Authors:  T J Ives; J J Frey; S J Furr; E J Bentz
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1987-01
View more
  10 in total

1.  The news on the street: prescription drugs on the black market.

Authors:  B Goldman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-07-28       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Opioid analgesic prescribing and use - an audit of analgesic prescribing by general practitioners and The Multidisciplinary Pain Centre at Royal Brisbane Hospital.

Authors:  L M Nissen; S E Tett; T Cramond; B Williams; M T Smith
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Randomised controlled trial of effect of feedback on general practitioners' prescribing in Australia.

Authors:  D L O'Connell; D Henry; R Tomlins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-02-20

Review 4.  Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.

Authors:  Louise Forsetlund; Mary Ann O'Brien; Lisa Forsén; Liv Merete Reinar; Mbah P Okwen; Tanya Horsley; Christopher J Rose
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-15

5.  Effect of a course-based intervention and effect of medical regulation on physicians' opioid prescribing.

Authors:  Meldon Kahan; Tara Gomes; David N Juurlink; Michael Manno; Lynn Wilson; Angela Mailis-Gagnon; Anita Srivastava; Rhoda Reardon; Irfan A Dhalla; Muhammad M Mamdani
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  General practitioners' awareness of their own drug prescribing profiles after postal feedback and outreach visits.

Authors:  Keld Vægter; Rolf Wahlström; Kurt Svärdsudd
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 2.384

7.  Effect of mailed feedback on drug prescribing profiles in general practice: a seven-year longitudinal study in Storstrøm County, Denmark.

Authors:  Keld Vægter; Rolf Wahlström; Hans Wedel; Kurt Svärdsudd
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 2.384

Review 8.  Evaluations of Continuing Health Provider Education Focused on Opioid Prescribing: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Abhimanyu Sud; Graziella R Molska; Fabio Salamanca-Buentello
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 7.840

Review 9.  High-risk prescribing and monitoring in primary care: how common is it, and how can it be improved?

Authors:  Tobias Dreischulte; Bruce Guthrie
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2012-08

10.  Irrational prescribing of over-the-counter (OTC) medicines in general practice: testing the feasibility of an educational intervention among physicians in five European countries.

Authors:  Christos Lionis; Elena Petelos; Sue Shea; Georgia Bagiartaki; Ioanna G Tsiligianni; Apostolos Kamekis; Vasiliki Tsiantou; Maria Papadakaki; Athina Tatsioni; Joanna Moschandreas; Aristoula Saridaki; Antonios Bertsias; Tomas Faresjö; Ashild Faresjö; Luc Martinez; Dominic Agius; Yesim Uncu; George Samoutis; Jiri Vlcek; Abobakr Abasaeed; Bodossakis Merkouris
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 2.497

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.