Literature DB >> 8538446

Individual differences in working memory strategies for reading expository text.

D Budd1, P Whitney, K J Turley.   

Abstract

This study investigated whether individual differences in working memory (WM) span are associated with different WM management strategies during the reading of expository text. In Experiment 1, probe questions were presented on line during reading to determine whether thematic information was maintained in WM throughout comprehension. The data indicated that readers across the range of WM span maintained thematic information in WM throughout the reading of a given passage. In Experiment 2, sentence reading times and accuracy for both topic and detail questions were measured in two conditions: when topic sentences were present and when topic sentences were absent. Subjects performed similarly across the range of WM span in the topic-present condition, but lower span subjects performed more poorly on detail questions in the topic-absent condition. In Experiment 3, the topic-present condition of the second experiment was replicated, except that subjects expected to receive questions about details only. Thematic processing and retention of topic and detail information all increased with span. Taken together, these results suggest that, for more difficult text processing tasks, high- and low-span subjects adopt different WM management strategies and these strategies influence what is learned from reading the text.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8538446     DOI: 10.3758/bf03200926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  9 in total

1.  Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: a test of four hypotheses.

Authors:  R W Engle; J Cantor; J J Carullo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity.

Authors:  M C MacDonald; M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Inference during reading.

Authors:  G McKoon; R Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 4.  A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Short-term storage and the processing of cohesion during reading.

Authors:  B Fischer; M Glanzer
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1986-08

6.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model.

Authors:  W Kintsch
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Monitoring changes in cognitive load during reading: an event-related brain potential and reaction time analysis.

Authors:  G E Raney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Coactivation and comprehension: contribution of text variables to the illusion of knowing.

Authors:  W Epstein; A M Glenberg; M M Bradley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-07

9.  Topicalization effects in cued recall of technical prose.

Authors:  D E Kieras
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1981-11
  9 in total
  7 in total

1.  Working memory capacity and strategy use.

Authors:  D S McNamara; J L Scott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-01

2.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind.

Authors:  Lisa Feldman Barrett; Michele M Tugade; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Classifying retrieval strategies as a function of working memory.

Authors:  Jenni L Schelble; David J Therriault; M David Miller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

4.  Reading strategies and prior knowledge in learning from hypertext.

Authors:  Ladislao Salmerón; Walter Kintsch; José J Cañas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-07

5.  The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts.

Authors:  Panayiora Kendeou; Paul Van den Broek
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-10

6.  Effects of Written, Auditory, and Combined Modalities on Comprehension by People With Aphasia.

Authors:  Kelly Knollman-Porter; Sarah E Wallace; Jessica A Brown; Karen Hux; Brielle L Hoagland; Darbi R Ruff
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 2.408

7.  The impact of working memory and the "process of process modelling" on model quality: Investigating experienced versus inexperienced modellers.

Authors:  Markus Martini; Jakob Pinggera; Manuel Neurauter; Pierre Sachse; Marco R Furtner; Barbara Weber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.