Literature DB >> 8535800

Intraoperative measurement of colonic anatomy and attachments with relevance to colonoscopy.

B P Saunders1, R K Phillips, C B Williams.   

Abstract

This study examined the variations in colonic length and mesenteric attachments in 118 patients undergoing laparotomy. Measurements were taken according to a set protocol with the bowel pulled medially, or towards the pubic symphysis or the xiphisternum, mimicking the possible displacements that may occur during colonoscopy. A free sigmoid loop was not present in 20 patients (17 percent) because of adhesions. A descending mesocolon of 10 cm or more in length was recorded in ten patients (8 percent) and an ascending mesocolon 10 cm or greater in 11 (9 percent). Some 24 patients (20 percent) had mobile splenic flexures and in 34 (29 percent) the mid-transverse colon reached the symphysis pubis or lower when pulled downwards. Mean (range) total colonic length was 114.1 (68-159) cm. This study helps define anatomical variations that may affect the facility, or otherwise, of colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8535800     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800821113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  10 in total

1.  Segmental colonic length and mobility.

Authors:  M Phillips; A Patel; P Meredith; O Will; C Brassett
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Three-dimensional variability of the mesentery and the superior mesenteric artery: application to virtual trauma modeling.

Authors:  Damien Massalou; Thierry Bège; Stéphane Bourgouin; Julien Mancini; Catherine Masson; Patrick Baqué; Stéphane-Victor Berdah
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Colonoscopy aided by magnetic 3D imaging: is the technique sufficiently sensitive to detect differences between men and women?

Authors:  R S Rowland; G D Bell; S Dogramadzi; C Allen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Ascending colon rotation following patient positional change during CT colonography: a potential pitfall in interpretation.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Kim; Seong Ho Park; Seung Soo Lee; Ah Young Kim; Hyun Kwon Ha
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  A peroperative comparison of Western and Oriental colonic anatomy and mesenteric attachments.

Authors:  B P Saunders; T Masaki; T Sawada; S Halligan; R K Phillips; T Muto; C B Williams
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Automatic and unbiased assessment of competence in colonoscopy: exploring validity of the Colonoscopy Progression Score (CoPS).

Authors:  Louise Preisler; Morten Bo Søndergaard Svendsen; Bo Søndergaard; Lene Brink; Tyge Nordentoft; Lars Bo Svendsen; Lars Konge
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-11-17

7.  Bowel habits and gender correlate with colon length measured by CT colonography.

Authors:  Kenichi Utano; Koichi Nagata; Tetsuro Honda; Takashi Kato; Alan Kawarai Lefor; Kazutomo Togashi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 2.374

8.  Effect of Reducing Abdominal Compression during Prone CT Colonography on Ascending Colonic Rotation during Supine-to-Prone Positional Change.

Authors:  Jong Keon Jang; Seong Ho Park; Jong Seok Lee; Hyun Jin Kim; Ah Young Kim; Hyun Kwon Ha
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  A hydraulically driven colonoscope.

Authors:  Stuart A Coleman; Silvia C Tapia-Siles; Markus Pakleppa; Jan B Vorstius; Robert P Keatch; Benjie Tang; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass.

Authors:  Rene Aleman; Emanuele Lo Menzo; Samuel Szomstein; Raul J Rosenthal
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.