Literature DB >> 8532490

Odor discrimination and recognition memory as a function of familiarization.

C Jehl1, J P Royet, A Holley.   

Abstract

The role of olfactory familiarization in short-term recognition of odors was investigated. Subjects were asked to make qualitative similarity judgments regarding either identical or dissimilar odors delivered in pairs. Except for control groups, subjects got familiarized with either the first (target) or the second (distractor) or both odors from a pair. Groups also differed according to the number of familiarization sessions--one, two, or three--taking place prior to the discrimination judgments. There was no significant influence of familiarization on correct recognition scores for pairs of identical odors. The most salient finding was a marked decrease of false alarms as a function of the number of familiarization sessions, which evidenced a positive effect of familiarization on discrimination for pairs of dissimilar odors. These judgments were not dependent on an intensity criterion. False alarms did not vary according to whether subjects had been familiarized with the target or the distractor or both odors from a pair. A positive correlation found between discrimination performances and the number of odors correctly remembered as being presented during familiarization suggested that familiarization resulted in long-term storing of memory traces for familiarized odors. Since familiarization was effective despite conditions unfavorable to the use of semantic encoding, the results argue in favor of a predominantly perceptual encoding of odors in the investigated task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8532490     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  10 in total

1.  Absolute judgments of odor quality.

Authors:  T ENGEN; C PFAFFMANN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1960-04

2.  Amplifying role of convergence in olfactory system a comparative study of receptor cell and second-order neuron sensitivities.

Authors:  P Duchamp-Viret; A Duchamp; M Vigouroux
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Experience facilitates olfactory quality discrimination.

Authors:  M D Rabin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-12

4.  Long-term memory of odors with and without verbal descriptions.

Authors:  T Engen; B M Ross
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1973-10

5.  A comparison of self-adaptation and cross-adaptation to odorants presented singly and in mixtures.

Authors:  B Berglund; T Engen
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Very short term recognition memory for odors.

Authors:  C Jehl; J P Royet; A Holley
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-12

7.  Recognition of common odors, pictures, and simple shapes.

Authors:  H T Lawless
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-12

8.  Receptor cell responses to odorants: similarities and differences among odorants.

Authors:  G Sicard; A Holley
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1984-02-06       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Odor recognition: familiarity, identifiability, and encoding consistency.

Authors:  M D Rabin; W S Cain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Sensory and semantic factors in recognition memory for odors and graphic stimuli: elderly versus young persons.

Authors:  C Murphy; W S Cain; M M Gilmore; R B Skinner
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1991
  10 in total
  15 in total

1.  Perceptual learning with odors: implications for psychological accounts of odor quality perception.

Authors:  R J Stevenson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

Review 2.  Olfactory imagery: a review.

Authors:  Richard J Stevenson; Trevor I Case
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-04

3.  Learning to smell the roses: experience-dependent neural plasticity in human piriform and orbitofrontal cortices.

Authors:  Wen Li; Erin Luxenberg; Todd Parrish; Jay A Gottfried
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  Human olfaction: a constant state of change-blindness.

Authors:  Lee Sela; Noam Sobel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  SMELL-S and SMELL-R: Olfactory tests not influenced by odor-specific insensitivity or prior olfactory experience.

Authors:  Julien W Hsieh; Andreas Keller; Michele Wong; Rong-San Jiang; Leslie B Vosshall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Perceptual and neural pliability of odor objects.

Authors:  Jay A Gottfried; Keng Nei Wu
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 7.  Acetylcholine and olfactory perceptual learning.

Authors:  Donald A Wilson; Max L Fletcher; Regina M Sullivan
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Repeated exposure to odors induces affective habituation of perception and sniffing.

Authors:  Camille Ferdenzi; Johan Poncelet; Catherine Rouby; Moustafa Bensafi
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 9.  The impact of expertise in olfaction.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Royet; Jane Plailly; Anne-Lise Saive; Alexandra Veyrac; Chantal Delon-Martin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-13

10.  A "Misfit" Theory of Spontaneous Conscious Odor Perception (MITSCOP): reflections on the role and function of odor memory in everyday life.

Authors:  Egon P Köster; Per Møller; Jozina Mojet
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.