Literature DB >> 1862819

Sensory and semantic factors in recognition memory for odors and graphic stimuli: elderly versus young persons.

C Murphy1, W S Cain, M M Gilmore, R B Skinner.   

Abstract

In four experiments, young (18-26 years, M = 21) and elderly (over 65 years, M = 72) people were compared for recognition memory of (a) graphic stimuli (faces of presidents and vice presidents, engineering symbols, and free forms) and (b) everyday odors. On graphic stimuli, the elderly consistently matched the young, but on odors the performance of the elderly was worse. Their poorer olfactory performance was observed after only 26 s, but became truly marked after 1 hr or more. Somewhere between 1 hr and 2 weeks, their odor performance fell to chance, but their graphic performance remained well above chance. Although the young did forget both graphic and odor materials progressively, their performance always stayed above chance over a 6-month period. Experiments 1 and 2 revealed that the elderly are less sensitive to odors than the young (with thresholds about 10-fold higher), which may explain, in part, their poorer olfactory memory performance. Knowledge that the subjects brought to the tasks by way of familiarity with and ability to name odors and faces played a positive role in recognition memory. Because of this positive role, together with the negative role played by verbal distraction, we conclude that odor recognition memory depends, perhaps heavily, on semantic processing. Impaired semantic processing may result even when odors are simply rendered desaturated, or pastel because of the weakening of olfactory sensitivity with aging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1862819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychol        ISSN: 0002-9556


  27 in total

1.  Semantic networks for odors and colors in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Jill Razani; Agnes Chan; Steven Nordin; Claire Murphy
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 2.  Decoding human swallowing via electroencephalography: a state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Iva Jestrović; James L Coyle; Ervin Sejdić
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Recollective experience in odor recognition: influences of adult age and familiarity.

Authors:  Maria Larsson; Christina Oberg; Lars Bäckman
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-10-06

4.  Impaired olfactory discrimination learning and decreased olfactory sensitivity in aged C57Bl/6 mice.

Authors:  Roseanne C Patel; John Larson
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  Odor memory: Review and analysis.

Authors:  R S Herz; T Engen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-09

6.  Olfactory working memory: effects of verbalization on the 2-back task.

Authors:  Fredrik U Jönsson; Per Møller; Mats J Olsson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-08

7.  Olfactory impairment predicts cognitive decline in early Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Michelle E Fullard; Baochan Tran; Lama M Chahine; James F Morley; Sharon X Xie; Jon B Toledo; Christi Scordia; Carly Linder; Rachael Purri; Daniel Weintraub; John E Duda
Journal:  Parkinsonism Relat Disord       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.891

8.  Differential effects of active attention and age on event-related potentials to visual and olfactory stimuli.

Authors:  Charlie D Morgan; Claire Murphy
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  A comparison of discrimination and reversal learning for olfactory and visual stimuli in aged rats.

Authors:  Andrea M Brushfield; Trinh T Luu; Bryan D Callahan; Paul E Gilbert
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.912

10.  A specialized odor memory buffer in primary olfactory cortex.

Authors:  Christina Zelano; Jessica Montag; Rehan Khan; Noam Sobel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.