Literature DB >> 2524711

Electromyographic recordings of 5 types of low back pain subjects and non-pain controls in different positions.

John G Arena1, Richard A Sherman, Glenda M Bruno, Timothy R Young.   

Abstract

Surface EMG recordings of bilateral paraspinal muscle tension were measured on 207 subjects (29 non-back pain controls, 20 individuals with spondyloarthritis, 52 with intervertebral disk disorders, 66 with unspecified musculoskeletal backache, 17 with some combination of the above 3 groups and 23 subjects with other types of back pain, including unknown, scoliosis and psychogenic) in 6 positions: standing, bending from the waist, rising, sitting with back unsupported, sitting with back supported and prone. Results of both individual and group analyses revealed a significant main effect of diagnosis. Post hoc analyses (Duncan's) revealed controls to have significantly lower overall EMG levels than the intervertebral disk disorders and unspecified musculoskeletal backache groups. A significant diagnosis by position interaction was observed. Analysis of simple main effects revealed this to be due primarily to control subjects during the standing position having lower EMG levels than all other groups, and intervertebral disk disorder subjects having higher EMG levels than all other groups during the supported sitting position. The importance of clearly defined diagnostic categories in low back pain research and the utility of measuring subjects in various positions are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2524711     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90153-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  10 in total

1.  Experimental muscle pain changes feedforward postural responses of the trunk muscles.

Authors:  Paul W Hodges; G Lorimer Moseley; Anna Gabrielsson; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  A time series analysis of the relationship between ambulatory EMG, pain, and stress in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  M E Geisser; M E Robinson; C Richardson
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1995-12

3.  Electromyographic recordings of paraspinal muscles: variations related to subcutaneous tissue thickness.

Authors:  M A Hemingway; H J Biedermann; J Inglis
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1995-03

4.  Assessment of lumbar EMG during static and dynamic activity in pain-free normals: implications for muscle scanning protocols.

Authors:  K R Lofland; P B Mumby; J E Cassisi; N L Palumbo; P M Camic
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1995-03

Review 5.  The flexion relaxation phenomenon in nonspecific chronic low back pain: prevalence, reproducibility and flexion-extension ratios. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anaïs Gouteron; Anne Tabard-Fougère; Abderrahmane Bourredjem; Jean-Marie Casillas; Stéphane Armand; Stéphane Genevay
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Pain differs from non-painful attention-demanding or stressful tasks in its effect on postural control patterns of trunk muscles.

Authors:  G Lorimer Moseley; M K Nicholas; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Pocket-size, portable surface EMG device in the differentiation of low back pain patients.

Authors:  P Jalovaara; T Niinimäki; H Vanharanta
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Towards a postural indicator of back pain in horses (Equus caballus).

Authors:  Clémence Lesimple; Carole Fureix; Emmanuel De Margerie; Emilie Sénèque; Hervé Menguy; Martine Hausberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparison of clinical examinations of back disorders and humans' evaluation of back pain in riding school horses.

Authors:  Clémence Lesimple; Carole Fureix; Véronique Biquand; Martine Hausberger
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  EEG individual power profiles correlate with tension along spine in horses.

Authors:  Mathilde Stomp; Serenella d'Ingeo; Séverine Henry; Clémence Lesimple; Hugo Cousillas; Martine Hausberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.