Literature DB >> 8527541

Meropenem versus tobramycin plus clindamycin for treatment of intraabdominal infections: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

R E Condon1, A P Walker, K R Sirinek, P W White, T C Fabian, R L Nichols, S E Wilson.   

Abstract

The efficacy of meropenem was compared to that of the combination of tobramycin plus clindamycin (T/C) in a multiinstitutional clinical trial of treatment for patients suffering intraabdominal infection. Among the 177 patients enrolled and randomized, 127 were clinically evaluable and 86 were microbiologically evaluable. Analysis of data on an intent-to-treat basis for all randomized patients and on the basis of a successful outcome (absence of any infection) for clinically evaluable patients failed to detect any difference in efficacy between the two treatments. Infection was cleared in 92% of meropenem- and 89% of T/C-treated clinically evaluable patients. Eradication of pathogens also was similar in the two treatment groups. Overall, adverse drug experiences were comparable between the two treatment groups, with the exception of an increase in serum creatinine level (which occurred more frequently in patients receiving T/C). Meropenem appears to be efficacious for the treatment of intraabdominal infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8527541     DOI: 10.1093/clinids/21.3.544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  15 in total

Review 1.  Monobactams and carbapenems for treatment of intraabdominal infections.

Authors:  B Brismar; C E Nord
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 2.  [Antimicrobial and antimycotic therapy of intra-abdominal infections].

Authors:  P Kujath; M Hoffmann; A Rodloff
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Canadian practice guidelines for surgical intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  Anthony W Chow; Gerald A Evans; Avery B Nathens; Chad G Ball; Glen Hansen; Godfrey Km Harding; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Karl Weiss; George G Zhanel
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.471

4.  Meropenem versus cefuroxime plus gentamicin for treatment of serious infections in elderly patients.

Authors:  C A Jaspers; H Kieft; B Speelberg; A Buiting; M van Marwijk Kooij; G J Ruys; H H Vincent; M C Vermeulen; A G Olink; I M Hoepelman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Imipenem and meropenem: Comparison of in vitro activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical trials and adverse effects.

Authors:  G G Zhanel; A E Simor; L Vercaigne; L Mandell
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1998-07

6.  Comparison of intravenous/oral ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole versus piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections.

Authors:  S M Cohn; P A Lipsett; T G Buchman; W G Cheadle; J W Milsom; S O'Marro; A E Yellin; S Jungerwirth; E V Rochefort; D C Haverstock; S F Kowalsky
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Cost efficacy of tazobactam/piperacillin versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infection.

Authors:  E S Dietrich; B Schubert; W Ebner; F Daschner
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Operative and nonoperative therapy of intraabdominal infections.

Authors:  D H Wittmann
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 9.  Primary and secondary peritonitis: an update.

Authors:  M Laroche; G Harding
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 10.  Meropenem: a review of its use in the treatment of serious bacterial infections.

Authors:  Claudine M Baldwin; Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.