Literature DB >> 8524250

Checkpoint genes required to delay cell division in response to nocodazole respond to impaired kinetochore function in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Y Wang1, D J Burke.   

Abstract

Inhibition of mitosis by antimitotic drugs is thought to occur by destruction of microtubules, causing cells to arrest through the action of one or more mitotic checkpoints. We have patterned experiments in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae after recent studies in mammalian cells that demonstrate the effectiveness of antimitotic drugs at concentrations that maintain spindle structure. We show that low concentrations of nocodazole delay cell division under the control of the previously identified mitotic checkpoint genes BUB1, BUB3, MAD1, and MAD2 and independently of BUB2. The same genes mediate the cell cycle delay induced in ctf13 mutants, limited for an essential kinetochore component. Our data suggest that a low concentration of nocodazole induces a cell cycle delay through checkpoint control that is sensitive to impaired kinetochore function. The BUB2 gene may be part of a separate checkpoint that responds to abnormal spindle structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8524250      PMCID: PMC230938          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.15.12.6838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  37 in total

1.  Dominant effects of tubulin overexpression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  D Burke; P Gasdaska; L Hartwell
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  A 125-base-pair CEN6 DNA fragment is sufficient for complete meiotic and mitotic centromere functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  G Cottarel; J H Shero; P Hieter; J H Hegemann
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Mitotic chromosome transmission fidelity mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  F Spencer; S L Gerring; C Connelly; P Hieter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The effects of methyl (5-(2-thienylcarbonyl)-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl) carbamate, (R 17934; NSC 238159), a new synthetic antitumoral drug interfering with microtubules, on mammalian cells cultured in vitro.

Authors:  M J De Brabander; R M Van de Veire; F E Aerts; M Borgers; P A Janssen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Mutational analysis of centromere DNA from chromosome VI of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  J H Hegemann; J H Shero; G Cottarel; P Philippsen; P Hieter
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Mutational and in vitro protein-binding studies on centromere DNA from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  R Ng; J Carbon
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Functions of microtubules in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle.

Authors:  C W Jacobs; A E Adams; P J Szaniszlo; J R Pringle
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Relationship of actin and tubulin distribution to bud growth in wild-type and morphogenetic-mutant Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  A E Adams; J R Pringle
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  CEP3 encodes a centromere protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  A V Strunnikov; J Kingsbury; D Koshland
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Structural rearrangements of tubulin and actin during the cell cycle of the yeast Saccharomyces.

Authors:  J V Kilmartin; A E Adams
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  55 in total

1.  Bub3 interaction with Mad2, Mad3 and Cdc20 is mediated by WD40 repeats and does not require intact kinetochores.

Authors:  R Fraschini; A Beretta; L Sironi; A Musacchio; G Lucchini; S Piatti
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-12-03       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Sister chromatid separation and chromosome re-duplication are regulated by different mechanisms in response to spindle damage.

Authors:  G Alexandru; W Zachariae; A Schleiffer; K Nasmyth
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-05-17       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Bifurcation of the mitotic checkpoint pathway in budding yeast.

Authors:  R Li
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A Bub2p-dependent spindle checkpoint pathway regulates the Dbf2p kinase in budding yeast.

Authors:  D Fesquet; P J Fitzpatrick; A L Johnson; K M Kramer; J H Toyn; L H Johnston
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-05-04       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  A spindle checkpoint functions during mitosis in the early Caenorhabditis elegans embryo.

Authors:  Sandra E Encalada; John Willis; Rebecca Lyczak; Bruce Bowerman
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 6.  Essential tension and constructive destruction: the spindle checkpoint and its regulatory links with mitotic exit.

Authors:  Agnes L C Tan; Padmashree C G Rida; Uttam Surana
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 3.857

7.  Generating chromosome instability through the simultaneous deletion of Mad2 and p53.

Authors:  Aurora A Burds; Annegret Schulze Lutum; Peter K Sorger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Microtubule attachment and spindle assembly checkpoint signalling at the kinetochore.

Authors:  Emily A Foley; Tarun M Kapoor
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 94.444

9.  Accumulation of mRNA coding for the ctf13p kinetochore subunit of Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends on the same factors that promote rapid decay of nonsense mRNAs.

Authors:  J N Dahlseid; J Puziss; R L Shirley; A L Atkin; P Hieter; M R Culbertson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Distinct chromosome segregation roles for spindle checkpoint proteins.

Authors:  Cheryl D Warren; D Michelle Brady; Raymond C Johnston; Joseph S Hanna; Kevin G Hardwick; Forrest A Spencer
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.