Literature DB >> 12221113

Distinct chromosome segregation roles for spindle checkpoint proteins.

Cheryl D Warren1, D Michelle Brady, Raymond C Johnston, Joseph S Hanna, Kevin G Hardwick, Forrest A Spencer.   

Abstract

The spindle checkpoint plays a central role in the fidelity of chromosome transmission by ensuring that anaphase is initiated only after kinetochore-microtubule associations of all sister chromatid pairs are complete. In this study, we find that known spindle checkpoint proteins do not contribute equally to chromosome segregation fidelity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Loss of Bub1 or Bub3 protein elicits the largest effect. Analysis of Bub1p reveals the presence of two molecular functions. An N-terminal 608-amino acid (nonkinase) portion of the protein supports robust checkpoint activity, and, as expected, contributes to chromosome segregation. A C-terminal kinase-encoding segment independently contributes to chromosome segregation through an unknown mechanism. Both molecular functions depend on association with Bub3p. A 156-amino acid fragment of Bub1p functions in Bub3p binding and in kinetochore localization by one-hybrid assay. An adjacent segment is required for Mad1p binding, detected by deletion analysis and coimmunoprecipitation. Finally, overexpression of wild-type BUB1 or MAD3 genes leads to chromosome instability. Analysis of this activity indicates that the Bub3p-binding domain of Bub1p contributes to this phenotype through disruption of checkpoint activity as well as through introduction of kinetochore or spindle damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12221113      PMCID: PMC124140          DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e02-04-0203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Cell        ISSN: 1059-1524            Impact factor:   4.138


  51 in total

1.  Complex formation between Mad1p, Bub1p and Bub3p is crucial for spindle checkpoint function.

Authors:  D M Brady; K G Hardwick
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 2.  Waiting for anaphase: Mad2 and the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  J V Shah; D W Cleveland
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-12-22       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Mammalian mad2 and bub1/bubR1 recognize distinct spindle-attachment and kinetochore-tension checkpoints.

Authors:  D A Skoufias; P R Andreassen; F B Lacroix; L Wilson; R L Margolis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Aneuploid colon cancer cells have a robust spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  A Tighe; V L Johnson; M Albertella; S S Taylor
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2001-07-03       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Retention of the BUB3 checkpoint protein on lagging chromosomes.

Authors:  M J Martinez-Exposito; K B Kaplan; J Copeland; P K Sorger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae CTF18 and CTF4 are required for sister chromatid cohesion.

Authors:  J S Hanna; E S Kroll; V Lundblad; F A Spencer
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Orchestrating anaphase and mitotic exit: separase cleavage and localization of Slk19.

Authors:  M Sullivan; C Lehane; F Uhlmann
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 8.  A new view of the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  M A Hoyt
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-09-03       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  A novel role of the budding yeast separin Esp1 in anaphase spindle elongation: evidence that proper spindle association of Esp1 is regulated by Pds1.

Authors:  S Jensen; M Segal; D J Clarke; S I Reed
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-01-08       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Spindle checkpoint protein Bub1 is required for kinetochore localization of Mad1, Mad2, Bub3, and CENP-E, independently of its kinase activity.

Authors:  H Sharp-Baker; R H Chen
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-06-11       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  87 in total

1.  Chromosome rearrangements and aneuploidy in yeast strains lacking both Tel1p and Mec1p reflect deficiencies in two different mechanisms.

Authors:  Jennifer L McCulley; Thomas D Petes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The kinetochore protein Bub1 participates in the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Chunying Yang; Haibo Wang; Yiran Xu; Kathryn L Brinkman; Hiromichi Ishiyama; Stephen T C Wong; Bo Xu
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2011-11-09

3.  S-phase checkpoint genes safeguard high-fidelity sister chromatid cohesion.

Authors:  Cheryl D Warren; D Mark Eckley; Marina S Lee; Joseph S Hanna; Adam Hughes; Brian Peyser; Chunfa Jie; Rafael Irizarry; Forrest A Spencer
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 4.138

4.  Expression deconvolution: a reinterpretation of DNA microarray data reveals dynamic changes in cell populations.

Authors:  Peng Lu; Aleksey Nakorchevskiy; Edward M Marcotte
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The spindle checkpoint: a quality control mechanism which ensures accurate chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Stephen S Taylor; Maria I F Scott; Andrew J Holland
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 6.  Connecting up and clearing out: how kinetochore attachment silences the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Geert J P L Kops; Jagesh V Shah
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Up-regulation of the mitotic checkpoint component Mad1 causes chromosomal instability and resistance to microtubule poisons.

Authors:  Sean D Ryan; Eric M C Britigan; Lauren M Zasadil; Kristen Witte; Anjon Audhya; Avtar Roopra; Beth A Weaver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The spindle assembly checkpoint in Caenorhabditis elegans: one who lacks Mad1 becomes mad one.

Authors:  Risa Kitagawa
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  The budding yeast silencing protein Sir1 is a functional component of centromeric chromatin.

Authors:  Judith A Sharp; Denise C Krawitz; Kelly A Gardner; Catherine A Fox; Paul D Kaufman
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  A dominant interfering Bub1 mutant is insufficient to induce or alter thymic tumorigenesis in vivo, even in a sensitized genetic background.

Authors:  Dale O Cowley; Ginger W Muse; Terry Van Dyke
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.