Literature DB >> 8522323

Complete and precise characterization of marker chromosomes by application of microdissection in prenatal diagnosis.

J Müller-Navia1, A Nebel, E Schleiermacher.   

Abstract

A straightforward and extremely efficient reverse chromosome painting technique is described which allows the rapid and unequivocal identification of any cytogenetically unclassifiable chromosome rearrangement. This procedure is used to determine the origin of unknown marker chromosomes found at prenatal diagnosis. After microdissection of the marker chromosome and amplification of the dissected fragment by a degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction (DOP-PCR), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to aberrant and normal metaphase chromosomes with the marker-derived probe pool is performed. With this strategy, marker chromosomes present in amniotic fluid samples were successfully identified in three cases. The origin of the supernumerary markers was ascertained as deriving from 3p(p12-cen), 18p(pter-cen) and 9p(p12-cen), respectively. Since a specific FISH signal on chromosomes can be obtained within 2 working days using a probe generated without any pretreatment from one chromosomal fragment only and without additional image processing devices, this technique is considered to be highly suitable for routine application in pre- and postnatal cytogenetic analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8522323     DOI: 10.1007/bf00210295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  32 in total

1.  Reverse chromosome painting: a method for the rapid analysis of aberrant chromosomes in clinical cytogenetics.

Authors:  N P Carter; M A Ferguson-Smith; M T Perryman; H Telenius; A H Pelmear; M A Leversha; M T Glancy; S L Wood; K Cook; H M Dyson
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR: general amplification of target DNA by a single degenerate primer.

Authors:  H Telenius; N P Carter; C E Bebb; M Nordenskjöld; B A Ponder; A Tunnacliffe
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.736

3.  De novo balanced chromosome rearrangements and extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagnosis: clinical significance and distribution of breakpoints.

Authors:  D Warburton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Isolation and characterization of human thioredoxin-encoding genes.

Authors:  K F Tonissen; J R Wells
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1991-06-30       Impact factor: 3.688

5.  Marker chromosomes in a series of 10,000 prenatal diagnoses. Cytogenetic and follow-up studies.

Authors:  E S Sachs; J O Van Hemel; J C Den Hollander; M G Jahoda
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Non C-banding variants in some normal families might be homogeneously staining regions.

Authors:  G C Webb; E J Krumins; S Z Eichenbaum; L E Voullaire; E Earle; K H Choó
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Delineation of marker chromosomes by reverse chromosome painting using only a small number of DOP-PCR amplified microdissected chromosomes.

Authors:  R Viersbach; G Schwanitz; M M Nöthen
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using DOP-PCR amplified flow-sorted chromosomes.

Authors:  H Telenius; A H Pelmear; A Tunnacliffe; N P Carter; A Behmel; M A Ferguson-Smith; M Nordenskjöld; R Pfragner; B A Ponder
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.006

9.  The origin of cytologically unidentifiable chromosome abnormalities: six cases ascertained by targeted chromosome-band painting.

Authors:  T Ohta; T Tohma; H Soejima; Y Fukushima; T Nagai; K Yoshiura; Y Jinno; N Niikawa
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Microdissection and cloning of DNA from a specific region of Drosophila melanogaster polytene chromosomes.

Authors:  F Scalenghe; E Turco; J E Edström; V Pirrotta; M Melli
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.316

View more
  9 in total

1.  An easy and reliable procedure of microdissection technique for the analysis of chromosomal breakpoints and marker chromosomes.

Authors:  J Weimer; M Kiechle; G Senger; U Wiedemann; A Ovens-Raeder; S Schuierer; M Kautza; R Siebert; N Arnold
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Detection of a de novo duplication of 1q32-qter by fluorescence in situ hybridisation in a boy with multiple malformations: further delineation of the trisomy 1q syndrome.

Authors:  H C Duba; M Erdel; J Löffler; L Bereuther; H Fischer; B Utermann; G Utermann
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  The use of laser microdissection for the preparation of chromosome-specific painting probes in farm animals.

Authors:  Svatava Kubickova; Halina Cernohorska; Petra Musilova; Jiri Rubes
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Molecular-cytogenetic characterization of the origin and the presence of pericentromeric euchromatin on minute supernumerary marker chromosomes (SMCs).

Authors:  T Liehr; G Hickmann; P Kozlowski; U Claussen; H Starke
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Mosaic supernumerary ring chromosome 19 identified by comparative genomic hybridisation.

Authors:  S R Ghaffari; E Boyd; J M Connor; A M Jones; J L Tolmie
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  Tetrasomy 18p de novo: identification by FISH with conventional and microdissection probes and analysis of parental origin and formation by short sequence repeat typing.

Authors:  T Eggermann; H Engels; B Moskalonek; M M Nöthen; J Müller-Navia; E Schleiermacher; G Schwanitz; S Stengel-Rutkowski
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA) for rapid distinction between unique sequence positive and negative marker chromosomes in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Diane Van Opstal; Marjan Boter; Petra Noomen; Malgorzata Srebniak; Guus Hamers; Robert-Jan H Galjaard
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Multiplex-FISH for pre- and postnatal diagnostic applications.

Authors:  S Uhrig; S Schuffenhauer; C Fauth; A Wirtz; C Daumer-Haas; C Apacik; M Cohen; J Müller-Navia; T Cremer; J Murken; M R Speicher
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Generation of chromosome painting probes from single chromosomes by laser microdissection and linker-adaptor PCR.

Authors:  Stefan Thalhammer; Sabine Langer; Michael R Speicher; Wolfgang M Heckl; Jochen B Geigl
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.620

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.