Literature DB >> 8515911

Use of infertility services in the United States.

L S Wilcox1, W D Mosher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the characteristics of women in the 1988 National Survey of Family Growth who reported having obtained medical services for impaired fecundity.
METHODS: From a national sample of 8450 women between the ages of 15-44, drawn from the civilian, noninstitutionalized population of the entire United States in 1988, we estimated the use of infertility services in the United States. Multivariate statistical modeling was used to identify the characteristics associated with use of infertility services among the 770 women who reported impaired fecundity in this survey.
RESULTS: Of all women with impaired fecundity, 43% had obtained some form of infertility service and 24% had obtained specialized infertility treatment--ovulation drugs, treatment of fallopian tubes, artificial insemination, or in vitro fertilization. Older, white, married women of higher socioeconomic status were most likely to have obtained specialized services, and a history of endometriosis was also strongly associated with having received such services.
CONCLUSION: Most women with impaired fecundity had not obtained infertility services. Use of specialized services was strongly associated with certain sociodemographic variables or a history of endometriosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8515911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  11 in total

Review 1.  Infertility: from a personal to a public health problem.

Authors:  A T Fidler; J Bernstein
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Sexual behaviour: related adverse health burden in the United States.

Authors:  S H Ebrahim; M T McKenna; J S Marks
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.519

3.  Who receives a medical evaluation for infertility in the United States?

Authors:  Leslie V Farland; Ai-Ris Y Collier; Katharine F Correia; Francine Grodstein; Jorge E Chavarro; Janet Rich-Edwards; Stacey A Missmer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Utilization of infertility services: how much does money matter?

Authors:  J Farley Ordovensky Staniec; Natalie J Webb
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  Adverse effects of fertility drugs.

Authors:  S G Derman; E Y Adashi
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Increased risk of severe maternal morbidity among infertile women: analysis of US claims data.

Authors:  Gayathree Murugappan; Shufeng Li; Ruth B Lathi; Valerie L Baker; Barbara Luke; Michael L Eisenberg
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Infertility evaluation and treatment among women in the United States.

Authors:  Lawrence M Kessler; Benjamin M Craig; Shayne M Plosker; Damon R Reed; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Reproductive Health Disparities in the USA: Self-Reported Race/Ethnicity Predicts Age of Menarche and Live Birth Ratios, but Not Infertility.

Authors:  Talia N Shirazi; Asher Y Rosinger
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2020-05-06

9.  An evaluation of the effect of infertility on marital, sexual satisfaction indices and health-related quality of life in women.

Authors:  Sameer Valsangkar; Trupti Bodhare; Samir Bele; Surendranath Sai
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2011-05

10.  The demographics of assisted reproductive technology births in a Nordic country.

Authors:  Alice Goisis; Siri Eldevik Håberg; Hans Ivar Hanevik; Maria Christine Magnus; Øystein Kravdal
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.