Literature DB >> 26785253

Who receives a medical evaluation for infertility in the United States?

Leslie V Farland1, Ai-Ris Y Collier2, Katharine F Correia3, Francine Grodstein4, Jorge E Chavarro5, Janet Rich-Edwards6, Stacey A Missmer7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate characteristics of receiving a medical evaluation for infertility among infertile women.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort.
SETTING: Academic institution. PATIENT(S): A total of 7,422 women who reported incident infertility between 1989 and 2009 in the Nurses' Health Study II. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Report of receiving a medical evaluation for infertility. RESULT(S): Approximately 65% of women who reported infertility had a medical evaluation for infertility. Infertile women who were parous (relative risk [RR] = 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.84), older, current smokers (RR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.83-0.96), or who had a higher body mass index (BMI) were less likely to report receiving a medical infertility evaluation. Infertile women who exercised frequently, took multivitamins (RR = 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.07), lived in states with comprehensive insurance coverage (RR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.00-1.19), had a high household income, or who had a recent physical examination (RR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.06-1.24) were more likely to report receiving a medical infertility evaluation. CONCLUSION(S): These findings highlight demographic, lifestyle, and access barriers to receiving medical infertility care. Historically, the discussion of barriers to infertility care has centered on financial access, geographic access, and socioeconomic status. Our findings build off literature by supporting previously reported associations and showcasing the importance of demographic and lifestyle factors in accessing care.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Infertility; barriers to access; barriers to care; fertility evaluation; fertility treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26785253      PMCID: PMC4853248          DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  27 in total

Review 1.  Understanding U.S. fertility: continuity and change in the National Survey of Family Growth, 1988-1995.

Authors:  W D Mosher; C A Bachrach
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb

Review 2.  When can odds ratios mislead?

Authors:  H T Davies; I K Crombie; M Tavakoli
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-03-28

3.  Infertility and impaired fecundity in the United States, 1982-2010: data from the National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Anjani Chandra; Casey E Copen; Elizabeth Hervey Stephen
Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report       Date:  2013-08-14

4.  Binomial regression in GLIM: estimating risk ratios and risk differences.

Authors:  S Wacholder
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Body weight and mortality among women.

Authors:  J E Manson; W C Willett; M J Stampfer; G A Colditz; D J Hunter; S E Hankinson; C H Hennekens; F E Speizer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-09-14       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Use of infertility services in the United States.

Authors:  L S Wilcox; W D Mosher
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Adolescent body mass index and infertility caused by ovulatory disorder.

Authors:  J W Rich-Edwards; M B Goldman; W C Willett; D J Hunter; M J Stampfer; G A Colditz; J E Manson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Use of infertility services in the United States: 1995.

Authors:  E H Stephen; A Chandra
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  2000 May-Jun

9.  Characteristics of infertile women in the United States and their use of infertility services.

Authors:  M B Hirsch; W D Mosher
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Reproducibility and validity of a self-administered physical activity questionnaire.

Authors:  A M Wolf; D J Hunter; G A Colditz; J E Manson; M J Stampfer; K A Corsano; B Rosner; A Kriska; W C Willett
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  16 in total

1.  Assisted reproductive technology use in the United States: a population assessment.

Authors:  Katherine Tierney; Yong Cai
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  The effect of ethnicity on semen analysis and hormones in the infertile patient.

Authors:  Nahid Punjani; Madhur Nayan; Keith Jarvi; Kirk Lo; Susan Lau; Ethan D Grober
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Epidemiologic Approaches for Studying Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Design, Methods, Analysis and Interpretation.

Authors:  Carmen Messerlian; Audrey J Gaskins
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2017-04-17

4.  Does Self-Identifying as Having a Health Problem Precede Medical Contact? The Case of Infertility.

Authors:  Arthur L Greil; Katherine M Johnson; Julia McQuillan; Karina M Shreffler; Ophra Leyser-Whalen; Michele Lowry
Journal:  Sociol Focus       Date:  2020-08-08

5.  Substantial Weight Gain in Adulthood Is Associated with Lower Probability of Live Birth Following Assisted Reproduction.

Authors:  Audrey J Gaskins; Mariel Arvizu; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Ramace Dadd; Irene Souter; Jorge E Chavarro
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  A pilot investigation of couple-level phthalates exposure and in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes.

Authors:  Thoin F Begum; Victor Y Fujimoto; Roy Gerona; Alexandra McGough; Nikolaus Lenhart; Rebecca Wong; Evelyn Mok-Lin; Jonathan Melamed; Celeste D Butts; Michael S Bloom
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.143

7.  Hospitalizations up to 8 years following delivery in assisted reproductive technology-treated and subfertile women.

Authors:  Leslie V Farland; Chia-Ling Liu; Hafsatou Diop; Howard J Cabral; Stacey A Missmer; Charles C Coddington; Sunah S Hwang; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Endometriosis - Myths and Realities.

Authors:  Leslie V Farland; Samantha Davidson; Naoko Sasamoto; Andrew W Horne; Stacey A Missmer
Journal:  Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep       Date:  2020-01-30

9.  The epidemiology of gynaecologic health: contemporary opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Sarah R Hoffman; Leslie V Farland; Kemi M Doll; Wanda K Nicholson; Maya A Wright; Whitney R Robinson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Toxic elements in follicular fluid adversely influence the likelihood of pregnancy and live birth in women undergoing IVF.

Authors:  Celeste D Butts; Michael S Bloom; Alexandra McGough; Nikolaus Lenhart; Rebecca Wong; Evelyn Mok-Lin; Patrick J Parsons; Aubrey L Galusha; Richard W Browne; Recai M Yucel; Beth J Feingold; Victor Y Fujimoto
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-07-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.