Literature DB >> 8536966

Heritability and selection on body size in a natural population of Drosophila buzzatii.

A Leibowitz1, M Santos, A Fontdevila.   

Abstract

An attempt was made to assess whether the phenotypic differences in body size (as measured by wing length) between wild-caught mating and single Drosophila buzzatii males could be attributed to genetic differences between the samples. Mating males were found to be larger and less variable than a random sample of the population. The progeny of the mating males (produced by crossing to a random female from a stock derived from the same population) were on average larger than those of the single males, but not significantly so (P = 0.063), and less phenotypically variable. This difference in variance between the samples suggests that there are indeed genetic differences between the paternal samples but tests for significant differences in the additive genetic component of variance proved inconclusive. For both samples it was found that while the ratio of additive genetic variation in the laboratory to phenotypic variation in the field yielded estimates of ĥs2(N) congruent to 10% the regression of offspring reared in the laboratory on parents from the wild was not significantly different from zero. In addition, it was found that the average development time of the progeny of the mating males is shorter than that of the random sample.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8536966      PMCID: PMC1206716     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  13 in total

1.  On the use of tester stocks to predict the competitive ability of genotypes.

Authors:  M Santos; K Fowler; L Partridge
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Genetic variance for body size in a natural population of Drosophila buzzatii.

Authors:  A Ruiz; M Santos; A Barbadilla; J E Quezada-Díaz; E Hasson; A Fontdevila
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Ecological aspects of the heritability of body size in Drosophila buzzatii.

Authors:  T Prout; J S Barker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Directional selection and the evolution of breeding date in birds.

Authors:  T Price; M Kirkpatrick; S J Arnold
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-05-06       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Breeding structure of natural populations of Drosophila buzzatii: effects of the distribution of larval substrates.

Authors:  R H Thomas; J S Barker
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Laboratory estimates of heritabilities and genetic correlations in nature.

Authors:  B Riska; T Prout; M Turelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Evolutionary quantitative genetics: how little do we know?

Authors:  N H Barton; M Turelli
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 16.830

8.  F statistics in Drosophila buzzatii: selection, population size and inbreeding.

Authors:  T Prout; J S Barker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Gene-environment interaction for body size and larval density in Drosophila melanogaster: an investigation of effects on development time, thorax length and adult sex ratio.

Authors:  M Santos; K Fowler; L Partridge
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Heritability of two morphological characters within and among natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J A Coyne; E Beecham
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  3 in total

1.  Quantitative-genetic analysis of wing form and bilateral asymmetry in isochromosomal lines of Drosophila subobscura using Procrustes methods.

Authors:  Pedro Fernández Iriarte; Walkiria Céspedes; Mauro Santos
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Estimating genetic correlations based on phenotypic data: a simulation-based method.

Authors:  Elias Zintzaras
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Toward a physical map of Drosophila buzzatii. Use of randomly amplified polymorphic dna polymorphisms and sequence-tagged site landmarks.

Authors:  H Laayouni; M Santos; A Fontdevila
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.562

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.