Literature DB >> 8513292

Validity and reliability of the Cosmed K2 to measure oxygen uptake.

F Lothian1, M R Farrally, C Mahoney.   

Abstract

The validity and reliability of the Cosmed K2 was tested in comparison with a Quinton on-line oxygen analysing system. A female subject was monitored on a treadmill using a progressive protocol and was measured on three occasions with each system. It was found at low workloads that the Cosmed K2 and the Quinton gave the same measure of oxygen uptake; at higher workloads the Cosmed K2 gave lower values, and at peak oxygen uptake the Cosmed K2 measured 22.2% less than the Quinton. The difference in the measurement of VE at peak oxygen uptake was 13%. The Cosmed K2's measurement of VO2 showed a greater variability between trials (variation coefficient 3.0-11.4%) than the Quinton (variation coefficient 1.1-3.9%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8513292     DOI: 10.1139/h93-016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1066-7814


  10 in total

Review 1.  Measurement of human energy expenditure, with particular reference to field studies: an historical perspective.

Authors:  Roy J Shephard; Yukitoshi Aoyagi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Accuracy and reliability of the ParvoMedics TrueOne 2400 and MedGraphics VO2000 metabolic systems.

Authors:  Scott E Crouter; Amanda Antczak; Jonathan R Hudak; Diane M DellaValle; Jere D Haas
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Automated metabolic gas analysis systems: a review.

Authors:  D J Macfarlane
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Development of a sports specific aerobic capacity test for karate - a pilot study.

Authors:  David Nunan
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Evaluation of the Oxycon Mobile metabolic system against the Douglas bag method.

Authors:  Hans Rosdahl; Lennart Gullstrand; Jane Salier-Eriksson; Patrik Johansson; Peter Schantz
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Validity of a new portable indirect calorimeter: the AeroSport TEEM 100.

Authors:  S Novitsky; K R Segal; B Chatr-Aryamontri; D Guvakov; V L Katch
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1995

7.  Energy cost of sport rock climbing in elite performers.

Authors:  J Booth; F Marino; C Hill; T Gwinn
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Physical activity energy expenditure measured using a portable telemetric device in comparison with a mass spectrometer.

Authors:  C Maiolo; G Melchiorri; L Iacopino; S Masala; A De Lorenzo
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 13.800

9.  Validation of a new portable metabolic system during an incremental running test.

Authors:  Víctor Díaz; Pedro José Benito; Ana Belén Peinado; María Alvarez; Carlos Martín; Valter Di Salvo; Fabio Pigozzi; Nicola Maffulli; Fracisco Javier Calderón
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

10.  Reliability of the VmaxST portable metabolic measurement system.

Authors:  J Blessinger; B Sawyer; C Davis; B A Irving; A Weltman; G Gaesser
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 3.118

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.