Literature DB >> 8507552

In vivo validation of distributed source solutions for the biomagnetic inverse problem.

A A Ioannides1, R Muratore, M Balish, S Sato.   

Abstract

Probabilistic modelling of continuous current sources is applied to the analysis of MEG signals generated by current dipoles implanted in the head of a living human subject. Estimates of the distribution of activity within a circular disk are obtained from signals generated by a single implanted dipole and by a pair of simultaneously active implanted dipoles. The orientation and depth of the disc is determined in advance from the experimental geometry and the measurements. The resulting reconstructions constitute the first in vivo validation of distributed source imaging; they provide a complementary test to earlier works using computer generated data and tests using point source analysis of signals generated by a single implanted dipole. In this work we provide a literal test of spatial resolution by resolving two nearby point-like sources. Temporal resolution is addressed in a de facto manner by imaging at one millisecond intervals. Computer simulations, with controlled amount of noise, are used to demonstrate the robustness of the results, and show the interplay between high spatial accuracy and noise insensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8507552     DOI: 10.1007/BF01128993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  12 in total

1.  Localization of implanted dipoles by magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  M Balish; S Sato; P Connaughton; C Kufta
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Localization of auditory response sources using magnetoencephalography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  A C Papanicolaou; S Baumann; R L Rogers; C Saydjari; E G Amparo; H M Eisenberg
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1990-01

3.  Comparison of magnetoencephalography with other functional imaging techniques.

Authors:  A A Ioannides
Journal:  Clin Phys Physiol Meas       Date:  1991

4.  Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model.

Authors:  M Scherg; D Von Cramon
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-01

5.  Subdural electrode as a dipole source for magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  D F Rose; S Sato; P D Smith; W Friauf; E Ducla-Soares
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-01

6.  Tonotopic organization of the auditory cortex: pitch versus frequency representation.

Authors:  C Pantev; M Hoke; B Lütkenhöner; K Lehnertz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-10-27       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Comparison of single current dipole and magnetic field tomography analyses of the cortical response to auditory stimuli.

Authors:  A A Ioannides; K D Singh; R Hasson; S B Baumann; R L Rogers; F C Guinto; A C Papanicolaou
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Scalp and depth recordings of induced deep cerebral potentials.

Authors:  D B Smith; R D Sidman; J S Henke; H Flanigin; D Labiner; C N Evans
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-02

9.  Magnetic field tomography of coherent thalamocortical 40-Hz oscillations in humans.

Authors:  U Ribary; A A Ioannides; K D Singh; R Hasson; J P Bolton; F Lado; A Mogilner; R Llinás
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A source analysis of the late human auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  M Scherg; J Vajsar; T W Picton
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  3 in total

1.  Coupling of regional activations in a human brain during an object and face affect recognition task.

Authors:  A A Ioannides; L C Liu; J Kwapien; S Drozdz; M Streit
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Magnetoencephalography: clinical application in epilepsy.

Authors:  Robert C Knowlton
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  Comparison of noise-normalized minimum norm estimates for MEG analysis using multiple resolution metrics.

Authors:  Olaf Hauk; Daniel G Wakeman; Richard Henson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 6.556

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.