Literature DB >> 8506637

Aging and neural spatial contrast sensitivity: photopic vision.

K B Burton1, C Owsley, M E Sloane.   

Abstract

This study investigated the extent to which older adults' loss in spatial contrast sensitivity at a photopic level is attributable to neural changes in the aged visual system. Laser interferometry was used to generate interference fringes which bypass the optics of the eye in presenting a grating target on the retina. Older adults in good eye health exhibited on average a small but statistically significant loss (0.1-0.2 log unit) in contrast sensitivity across the spatial frequency range tested, although there was considerable overlap between young and old adults. This loss in contrast sensitivity for interference fringes accounted for less than half of the photopic contrast sensitivity loss at higher frequencies reported for older adults in studies using conventional direct-viewing techniques in which the optics of the aged eye are not bypassed. We conclude that neural changes in the aged visual system have a rather minor contribution to older adults' loss in spatial contrast sensitivity at a photopic level.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8506637     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90077-a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  23 in total

Review 1.  Aging and vision.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Senescence of spatial chromatic contrast sensitivity. I. Detection under conditions controlling for optical factors.

Authors:  Joseph L Hardy; Peter B Delahunt; Katsunori Okajima; John S Werner
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Senescence of spatial chromatic contrast sensitivity. II. Matching under natural viewing conditions.

Authors:  Peter B Delahunt; Joseph L Hardy; Katsunori Okajima; John S Werner
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 4.  [Photopic contrast sensitivity. Local contrast perception].

Authors:  M Bach; W Wesemann; G Kolling; J Bühren; H Krastel; U Schiefer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Aging and blur adaptation.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; Joseph L Hardy; Michael A Webster; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Micro and regular saccades across the lifespan during a visual search of "Where's Waldo" puzzles.

Authors:  Nicholas L Port; Jane Trimberger; Steve Hitzeman; Bryan Redick; Stephen Beckerman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Scotopic spatiotemporal sensitivity differences between young and old adults.

Authors:  Cynthia L Clark; Joseph L Hardy; Vicki J Volbrecht; John S Werner
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Improving vision among older adults: behavioral training to improve sight.

Authors:  Denton J DeLoss; Takeo Watanabe; George J Andersen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-03-06

9.  Normative best-corrected values of the visual image quality metric VSX as a function of age and pupil size.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Jason D Marsack; Larry N Thibos; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  Role of high-order aberrations in senescent changes in spatial vision.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; Stacey S Choi; Nathan Doble; Joseph L Hardy; Julia W Evans; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.