Literature DB >> 28913481

Management of the hopelessly ill patient: to stop or not to start?

Gabriel M Gurman1.   

Abstract

The paper discusses the subject of futile treatment in the case of a hopelessly ill patient. The topic has many facets, among them the ethical precepts of preventing futile treatment, but also the economic and logistic impact of treating patients who do not have a fair chance of benefitting from managing their medical condition. A 75-year old patient, suffering from an advanced stage of Alzheimer's disease and a clinical picture of acute surgical abdomen, is presented and two approaches are discussed. The first scenario is the aggressive management, including immediate laparotomy and admission to an intensive care unit, a solution without a fair chance of saving the patient's life. The most favorable, but theoretical, output in this case would be the patient's return to his previous mental condition, without any connection with the reality and surroundings and in permanent need for help, supervision and assistance. The second option is letting the patient die in dignity, alleviating pain and surrounded by family. The role of the primary care physician and family is discussed and some ethical principles are presented in order to emphasize the importance of preventing futile treatment in a case of a terminally ill patient.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ethics; futile treatment; hopelessly ill

Year:  2016        PMID: 28913481      PMCID: PMC5505369          DOI: 10.21454/rjaic.7518.231.hps

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care        ISSN: 2392-7518


  24 in total

1.  The rise and fall of the futility movement.

Authors:  P R Helft; M Siegler; J Lantos
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-07-27       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Court rules that care cannot be withdrawn where parents disagree on treatment plan. In re: Jane Doe, A Minor, Civil Action No. D-93064, Superior Court of Fulton County, GA.

Authors:  K N Swisher; G S Berriman
Journal:  J Healthc Risk Manag       Date:  1992

3.  Enteral feeding in terminal dementia--a dilemma without a consensual solution.

Authors:  Yehuda Van Dijk; Moshe Sonnenblick
Journal:  Isr Med Assoc J       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 0.892

4.  The paradox of health.

Authors:  A J Barsky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-02-18       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  An introduction to philosophical medical ethics: the Arthur case.

Authors:  R Gillon
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-04-13

6.  Decisions near the end of life: professional views on life-sustaining treatments.

Authors:  M Z Solomon; L O'Donnell; B Jennings; V Guilfoy; S M Wolf; K Nolan; R Jackson; D Koch-Weser; S Donnelley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  A preventive ethics approach to counseling patients about clinical futility in the primary care setting.

Authors:  D J Doukas; L B McCullough
Journal:  Arch Fam Med       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec

8.  Survival of critically ill patients hospitalized in and out of intensive care units under paucity of intensive care unit beds.

Authors:  Elisheva Simchen; Charles L Sprung; Noya Galai; Yana Zitser-Gurevich; Yaron Bar-Lavi; Gabriel Gurman; Moti Klein; Amiram Lev; Leon Levi; Fabio Zveibil; Micha Mandel; George Mnatzaganian
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Dissociation between the wishes of terminally ill parents and decisions by their offspring.

Authors:  M Sonnenblick; Y Friedlander; A Steinberg
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Low-dose corticosteroid treatment and mortality in refractory abdominal septic shock after emergency laparotomy.

Authors:  Takashi Tagami; Hiroki Matsui; Kiyohide Fushimi; Hideo Yasunaga
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 6.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.