Literature DB >> 8501667

Professional attitudes to cardiopulmonary resuscitation in departments of geriatric and general medicine.

K N Davies1, D King, J H Silas.   

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation for the elderly has long been a contentious issue. We have established by means of a postal survey the attitudes of 300 consultant geriatricians, 300 consultant physicians and 249 registered nurses to cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We also audited 400 case notes to document current practice in departments of general medicine and medicine for the elderly. No formal resuscitation policies were in operation. Geriatricians were more likely than physicians to make a positive resuscitation decision (p < 0.001), and involve nursing staff in the decision-making (p < 0.001). All professional groups felt age was unimportant in deciding on resuscitation, while the patients' prognoses and their wishes were most important. Case note audit revealed that geriatricians were better at documenting resuscitation decisions. Inappropriate resuscitation of patients is unacceptable. Each department or hospital ought to have agreed guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8501667      PMCID: PMC5396649     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond        ISSN: 0035-8819


  16 in total

1.  Closed-chest cardiac massage.

Authors:  W B KOUWENHOVEN; J R JUDE; G G KNICKERBOCKER
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1960-07-09       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Predictors of survival of in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  C Lazzam; J L McCans
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.223

3.  Implications of New York's do-not-resuscitate law.

Authors:  J A McClung; R S Kamer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-07-26       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Survey of 3765 cardiopulmonary resuscitations in British hospitals (the BRESUS Study): methods and overall results.

Authors:  H Tunstall-Pedoe; L Bailey; D A Chamberlain; A K Marsden; M E Ward; D A Zideman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-05-23

5.  Resuscitation decisions in a general hospital.

Authors:  K Stewart; K Abel; G S Rai
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-03-24

6.  Cardiac arrests in a geriatric unit.

Authors:  A J Bayer; B C Ang; M S Pathy
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 10.668

7.  Elderly patients' views on cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  N P Gunasekera; D J Tiller; L T Clements; B K Bhattacharya
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 10.668

8.  Survey of "do not resuscitate" orders in a district general hospital.

Authors:  E J Aarons; N J Beeching
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-12-14

9.  Outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the elderly.

Authors:  D J Murphy; A M Murray; B E Robinson; E W Campion
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-08-01       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Resuscitation: how do we decide? A prospective study of physicians' preferences and the clinical course of hospitalized patients.

Authors:  M E Charlson; F L Sax; C R MacKenzie; S D Fields; R L Braham; R G Douglas
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-03-14       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  5 in total

1.  Decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  D Florin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-06-25

2.  Views of elderly patients and their relatives on cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  R Morgan; D King; C Prajapati; J Rowe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-06-25

Review 3.  Determining resuscitation preferences of elderly inpatients: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Christopher Frank; Daren K Heyland; Benjamin Chen; Donald Farquhar; Kathryn Myers; Ken Iwaasa
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Increasing use of DNR orders in the elderly worldwide: whose choice is it?

Authors:  E P Cherniack
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the elderly: patients' and relatives' views.

Authors:  G E Mead; C J Turnbull
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.903

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.