Literature DB >> 8501433

Speed versus accuracy instructions, study time, and the mirror effect.

K Kim1, M Glanzer.   

Abstract

Attention/likelihood theory is a model of recognition memory designed to explain the mirror effect (Glanzer & Adams, 1985, 1990). The theory and the effect were studied using speed versus accuracy instructions and short versus long exposure of stimuli. Speed versus accuracy instructions during test and short versus long exposure of stimuli during study were used to vary the number of features sampled from stimuli. When the number of features sampled was reduced either by speed instructions or by shorter exposure, recognition performance was impaired. The theory predicts that in such cases, all distances between underlying distributions will contract. That means, moreover, that when recognition accuracy is decreased for old stimuli, it is also decreased for new stimuli. These predictions were supported by the data from three experiments.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8501433     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.19.3.638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  9 in total

1.  Shades of the mirror effect: recognition of faces with and without sunglasses.

Authors:  W E Hockley; D H Hemsworth; A Consoli
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

2.  The variance theory of the mirror effect in recognition memory.

Authors:  S Sikström
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

3.  A reexamination of stimulus-frequency effects in recognition: two mirrors for low- and high-frequency pseudowords.

Authors:  Lynn M Reder; Paige Angstadt; Melanie Cary; Michael A Erickson; Michael S Ayers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  The word frequency effect for recognition memory and the elevated-attention hypothesis.

Authors:  Kenneth J Malmberg; Thomas O Nelson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-01

5.  Intention to learn influences the word frequency effect in recall but not in recognition memory.

Authors:  Stephen A Dewhurst; Karen R Brandt; Melanie S Sharp
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-12

6.  Orthographic neighborhood size effects in recognition memory.

Authors:  Gina A Glanc; Robert L Greene
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

7.  Encoding, repetition, and the mirror effect in recognition memory: symmetry in motion.

Authors:  A Hilford; M Glanzer; K Kim
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-09

8.  Revising recognition judgments during noisy recognition evidence accumulation: The dynamics of losses versus gains.

Authors:  Antonio Jaeger; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-10

9.  Reflections of the mirror effect for item and associative recognition.

Authors:  W E Hockley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.