Literature DB >> 7756076

Are the economically active more deserving?

B Gaffney1, F Kee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the possibility of an association between the duration of medical treatment before coronary angiography and demographic and non-clinical factors.
DESIGN: A systematic review of a random sample of 500 patients undergoing their first angiographic assessment.
SUBJECTS: 500 cases were selected randomly from patients investigated in 1991 at the two catheterisation centres in Northern Ireland. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The duration of medical management before angiography.
RESULTS: 346 had elective and 154 urgent catheterisation. The duration of medical management was adjusted for both case mix (age at onset, body mass index, angina grade, history of myocardial infarction, history of hypertension, diabetes or hyperlipidaemia, treatment intensity) and other demographic variables (sex, smoking status, an indicator of "deprivation", and distance of the patient's area of residence from the hospital). After this adjustment the mean duration of medical management before angiography was twice as long for economically inactive patients as for those who were economically active. In a multiple regression, the relevant beta coefficient was 0.44 (95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.58, P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that, in making discretionary decisions about when to refer patients with angina for revascularisation assessment, doctors may be influenced by non-clinical factors unrelated to disease severity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7756076      PMCID: PMC483836          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.73.4.385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Heart J        ISSN: 0007-0769


  33 in total

1.  Relation between all cause standardised mortality ratios and two indices of deprivation at regional and district level in England.

Authors:  N Mays; S Chinn
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  QALYfying the value of life.

Authors:  J Harris
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Sociologic influences on decision-making by clinicians.

Authors:  J M Eisenberg
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  A comparison of administrative versus clinical data: coronary artery bypass surgery as an example. Ischemic Heart Disease Patient Outcomes Research Team.

Authors:  P S Romano; L L Roos; H S Luft; J G Jollis; K Doliszny
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Eighth survey of staffing in cardiology in the United Kingdom 1992.

Authors:  D Chamberlain; J Parker; R Balcon; M Webb-Peploe; S Cobbe; D Boyle; M Tynan; S Hunter; K Reval
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-05

6.  How coronary angiography is used. Clinical determinants of appropriateness.

Authors:  M R Chassin; J Kosecoff; D H Solomon; R H Brook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-11-13       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Is choice of general practitioner important for patients having coronary artery investigations?

Authors:  F Kee; B Gaffney; C Canavan; J Little; W McConnell; A M Telford; J D Watson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-03

8.  Referrals for coronary angiography in a high risk population.

Authors:  F Kee
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1993-06

9.  Patterns of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in the sexes: a 26-year follow-up of the Framingham population.

Authors:  D J Lerner; W B Kannel
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Physician ratings of appropriate indications for three procedures: theoretical indications vs indications used in practice.

Authors:  R E Park; A Fink; R H Brook; M R Chassin; K L Kahn; N J Merrick; J Kosecoff; D H Solomon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Ageism in cardiology.

Authors:  A Bowling
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-20

2.  Risk factors differ by first manifestation of cardiovascular disease in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Rachel G Miller; Trevor J Orchard; Tina Costacou
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 5.602

3.  Predictors for waiting time for coronary angioplasty in a high risk population.

Authors:  B Gaffney; F Kee
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-12

4.  Is hospital care involved in inequalities in coronary heart disease mortality? Results from the French WHO-MONICA Project in men aged 30-64.

Authors:  T Lang; P Ducimetière; D Arveiler; P Amouyel; J Ferrières; J B Ruidavets; M Montaye; B Haas; A Bingham
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.710

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.