Literature DB >> 8499676

Transfer of embryos into the uterus: how much do technical factors affect pregnancy rates?

T al-Shawaf1, R Dave, J Harper, D Linehan, P Riley, I Craft.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to identify the effect on outcome of (a) ultrasound-assisted embryo transfer, (b) the use of different embryo transfer catheters, and (c) the length of time the patients remain in the supine position after embryo transfer.
SETTING: The setting was a private fertility center.
SUBJECTS: This was a prospective study of 178 in vitro fertilization and embryo transfers (IVF-ET) and 63 frozen embryo replacements (FER).
RESULTS: The pregnancy rate was 28.7% following IVF-ET and 31.8% for FER. Ultrasound-assisted transfer did not affect the outcome (29 vs 30.3%). There was no difference in the performance of the Wallace and Frydman catheters with regard to outcome (30.3 vs 30.7%). Although there was an increase in pregnancy rate as the time interval in the supine position after ET increased, this needs a larger study.
CONCLUSION: The parameter studies did not affect the outcome of IVF/ET or FER. Some factors encouraged us to recommend ultrasound-assisted transfer in some cases, and the use of a Frydman catheter for transfer and to encourage the supine position after transfer for longer periods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8499676     DOI: 10.1007/BF01204437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  7 in total

1.  Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: a controlled trial.

Authors:  V A Hurley; J C Osborn; M A Leoni; J Leeton
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Embryo transfer to low uterine cavity.

Authors:  J Waterstone; R Curson; J Parsons
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-06-08       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Does the choice of catheter for embryo transfer influence the success rate of in-vitro fertilization?

Authors:  Y Gonen; M Dirnfeld; S Goldman; M Koifman; H Abramovici
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Performance of different embryo transfer catheters in a human in vitro fertilization program.

Authors:  A Wisanto; R Janssens; J Deschacht; M Camus; P Devroey; A C Van Steirteghem
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Ultrasonic assessment of endometrial changes in stimulated cycles in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program.

Authors:  B Smith; R Porter; K Ahuja; I Craft
Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf       Date:  1984-12

6.  The reproductive outcome following a superhigh response to stimulation in gamete intrafallopian transfer program.

Authors:  T al-Shawaf; A Nolan; P Nadkarni; J Harper; J Brown; R Guirgis; G Emerson; M Bayly; I Craft
Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf       Date:  1991-08

7.  Embryo transfer technique as a cause of ectopic pregnancies in in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  J L Yovich; S R Turner; A J Murphy
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 7.329

  7 in total
  12 in total

1.  Impact of technical difficulties, choice of catheter, and the presence of blood on the success of embryo transfer--experience from a single provider.

Authors:  Hassan N Sallam; Abdel Fattah Agameya; Ashraf Farrag Rahman; Fathy Ezzeldin; Ahmed N Sallam
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Ultrasound guidance is not necessary during easy embryo transfers.

Authors:  Anice Maria Vieira de Camargo Martins; Ricardo L R Baruffi; Ana L Mauri; Claudia Petersen; João Batista Alcantara Oliveira; Paula Contart; Anagloria Pontes; José G Franco
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Abdominal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves clinical pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization: experiences from 330 clinical investigations.

Authors:  Rong Li; Lihua Lu; Guiqin Hao; Kai Zhong; Zhiming Cai; Wei Wang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Pregnancy outcome related to the site of embryo deposition in the uterus.

Authors:  B Rosenlund; P Sjöblom; T Hillensjö
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Preparation of endometrium for frozen embryo replacement cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hakan Yarali; Mehtap Polat; Sezcan Mumusoglu; Irem Yarali; Gurkan Bozdag
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Does catheter choice during embryo transfer alter the pregnancy rate?

Authors:  Pankaj Talwar; Nikita Naredi; K Sandeep; G S Joneja; B S Duggal
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-10-22

7.  Validity of trans-rectal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer against retroflexed uterus.

Authors:  Tetsuya Isobe; Hiroyuki Minoura; Hiroaki Kawato; Nagayasu Toyoda
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2004-01-29

8.  The effect of ease of transfer and type of catheter used on pregnancy and implantation rates in an IVF program.

Authors:  G De Placido; M Wilding; I Stina; A Mollo; E Alviggi; A Tolino; N Colacurci; Matteo L De; M Marino; B Dale
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  The influence of uterine position on pregnancy rates with in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.

Authors:  S K Agarwal; S Coe; R P Buyalos
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Absolute position versus relative position in embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hwang Kwon; Dong-Hee Choi; Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.