Literature DB >> 2744191

Performance of different embryo transfer catheters in a human in vitro fertilization program.

A Wisanto1, R Janssens, J Deschacht, M Camus, P Devroey, A C Van Steirteghem.   

Abstract

In a prospective and randomized study on 400 consecutive embryo transfers (ETs), the performance of three different transfer catheters was evaluated. In cases of difficult ET, the TDT catheter (Prodimed, Neuilly-en-Thelle, France) performed the best. However, the pregnancy rate with this catheter was the lowest (9.2%/ET). A better pregnancy rate (19.4%/ET) can be achieved when TDT catheter was used under ultrasound guidance. The Frydman catheter (Prodimed, Neuilly-en-Thelle, France) yielded the highest pregnancy rate (32.3%/ET) but also the highest frequency of difficult transfer procedures. The Wallace catheter (H.G. Wallace Limited, Colchester, England) showed similar performance, but the pregnancy rate was lower (19.2%/ET) compared with the Frydman catheter. Therefore, the Frydman catheter is used as the first choice, and for difficult transfers the TDT catheter under ultrasound guidance can be recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2744191     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60793-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  12 in total

1.  Impact of technical difficulties, choice of catheter, and the presence of blood on the success of embryo transfer--experience from a single provider.

Authors:  Hassan N Sallam; Abdel Fattah Agameya; Ashraf Farrag Rahman; Fathy Ezzeldin; Ahmed N Sallam
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Ultrasound guidance is not necessary during easy embryo transfers.

Authors:  Anice Maria Vieira de Camargo Martins; Ricardo L R Baruffi; Ana L Mauri; Claudia Petersen; João Batista Alcantara Oliveira; Paula Contart; Anagloria Pontes; José G Franco
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Pregnancy outcome related to the site of embryo deposition in the uterus.

Authors:  B Rosenlund; P Sjöblom; T Hillensjö
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Contamination of embryo transfer catheter and treatment outcome in in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  A Awonuga; A Nabi; J Govindbhai; H Birch; B Stewart
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Does catheter choice during embryo transfer alter the pregnancy rate?

Authors:  Pankaj Talwar; Nikita Naredi; K Sandeep; G S Joneja; B S Duggal
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-10-22

6.  Multiple attempts at embryo transfer: effect on pregnancy outcome in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program.

Authors:  D S Visser; F L Fourie; H F Kruger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Transfer of embryos into the uterus: how much do technical factors affect pregnancy rates?

Authors:  T al-Shawaf; R Dave; J Harper; D Linehan; P Riley; I Craft
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Modified hysterosalpingography catheter for embryo transfer and intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  S Pazdziorko; D Tulchinsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Methodology of human embryo transfer following assisted reproduction.

Authors:  S Friedler; A Lewin; J G Schenker
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Factors affecting assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy rates: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Tiffany L Rhodes; Thomas P McCoy; H Lee Higdon; William R Boone
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.