Literature DB >> 1806567

Does the choice of catheter for embryo transfer influence the success rate of in-vitro fertilization?

Y Gonen1, M Dirnfeld, S Goldman, M Koifman, H Abramovici.   

Abstract

The performance of two different transfer catheters has been evaluated in 193 consecutive embryo transfers. Forty pregnancies were achieved, corresponding to a pregnancy rate of 21% of all embryo transfers. The Frydman catheter was used in 123 attempts whereas 70 embryo transfers were performed with the Tom Cat catheter. The Tom Cat catheter yielded a significantly higher pregnancy rate than the Frydman catheter (28% versus 16%; P = 0.03). The mean number of embryos transferred per attempt was similar in the two groups (2.9 +/- 0.1 and 3.0 +/- 0.1 in the Tom Cat and Frydman groups respectively) as was the quality. When more than three embryos were transferred, a pregnancy rate of 37% per embryo transfer was achieved using the Tom Cat versus 20% using the Frydman catheters (P = 0.03). A higher frequency of difficult transfer procedures was observed when the Frydman catheter was used while the Tom Cat performed much better in difficult cases. An alternate use of the two catheters suggests a significantly better performance of the Tom Cat catheter in relation to the efficiency of establishing pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1806567     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  9 in total

1.  Impact of technical difficulties, choice of catheter, and the presence of blood on the success of embryo transfer--experience from a single provider.

Authors:  Hassan N Sallam; Abdel Fattah Agameya; Ashraf Farrag Rahman; Fathy Ezzeldin; Ahmed N Sallam
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Ultrasound guidance is not necessary during easy embryo transfers.

Authors:  Anice Maria Vieira de Camargo Martins; Ricardo L R Baruffi; Ana L Mauri; Claudia Petersen; João Batista Alcantara Oliveira; Paula Contart; Anagloria Pontes; José G Franco
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Multiple attempts at embryo transfer: effect on pregnancy outcome in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program.

Authors:  D S Visser; F L Fourie; H F Kruger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Transfer of embryos into the uterus: how much do technical factors affect pregnancy rates?

Authors:  T al-Shawaf; R Dave; J Harper; D Linehan; P Riley; I Craft
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  A plea for a more fastidious and objective use of statistics.

Authors:  D E Walters
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Methodology of human embryo transfer following assisted reproduction.

Authors:  S Friedler; A Lewin; J G Schenker
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Factors affecting assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy rates: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Tiffany L Rhodes; Thomas P McCoy; H Lee Higdon; William R Boone
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  The effect of ease of transfer and type of catheter used on pregnancy and implantation rates in an IVF program.

Authors:  G De Placido; M Wilding; I Stina; A Mollo; E Alviggi; A Tolino; N Colacurci; Matteo L De; M Marino; B Dale
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  The impact of the depth of embryo replacement on IVF outcome.

Authors:  Arianna Pacchiarotti; Mohamed A Mohamed; Giulietta Micara; Daniela Tranquilli; Antonella Linari; Salomè M B Espinola; Cesare Aragona
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 3.412

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.