Literature DB >> 8498703

Force generation by orthodontic coil springs.

J A von Fraunhofer1, P W Bonds, B E Johnson.   

Abstract

Nickel titanium (NiTi) coil springs are a new development in orthodontics, designed to produce light continuous forces. This study compares the force delivery by NiTi open and closed coil springs during unloading (de-activation) to that provided by comparable stainless steel (SS) springs. Open-coil springs (0.010 x 0.035 inch) were compressed from their initial length of 15 mm to 6 mm and the forces generated with spring recovery recorded. Closed-coil springs (0.009 x 0.035 inch) were distracted from their initial length of 3 mm to 9 mm and the force recorded as the spring recovered. The closed-coil NiTi springs produced light continuous forces of 75-90 g over the distraction range of 6 mm while the open-coil springs produced forces of 55-70 g within the 9 mm compression range. SS springs produced heavier forces, ca. 200 g, for an activation of 1 mm and the generated force increased rapidly as the activation was increased. The findings indicate that NiTi coil springs deliver optimal forces for orthodontic tooth movement over a longer activation range than comparable SS springs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8498703     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1993)063<0145:FGBOCS>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  11 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanical configurations of mandibular transport distraction osteogenesis devices.

Authors:  Uriel Zapata; Mohammed E Elsalanty; Paul C Dechow; Lynne A Opperman
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Which one closes extraction spaces faster: en masse retraction or two-step retraction? A randomized prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Patricia Pigato Schneider; Ki Beom Kim; André da Costa Monini; Ary Dos Santos-Pinto; Luiz Gonzaga Gandini
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Superelasticity and force plateau of nickel-titanium springs: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Camila Ivini Viana Vieira; Sergei Godeiro Fernandes Rabelo Caldas; Lídia Parsekian Martins; Renato Parsekian Martins
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016-06

4.  In-vivo force decay of nickel-titanium closed-coil springs.

Authors:  Crystal Cox; Tung Nguyen; Lorne Koroluk; Ching-Chang Ko
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Forces of various nickel titanium closed coil springs.

Authors:  Anthony Louis Maganzini; Alan M Wong; Mairaj K Ahmed
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Effect of immersion in hydrochloric acid and sodium hypochlorite and autoclave sterilization on the force characteristics of orthodontic nickel-titanium open coils.

Authors:  Saeed Noorollahian; Mehrnaz Zakizade
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2021-02-23

7.  Open-coil retraction spring.

Authors:  Pavankumar Janardan Vibhute
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2011-09-29

8.  Sleeve Push Technique: A Novel Method of Space Gaining.

Authors:  Sanjeev Verma; Nameksh Raj Bhupali; Deepak Kumar Gupta; Sombir Singh; Satinder Pal Singh
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

9.  Effects of reversing the coiling direction on the force-deflection characteristics of nickel-titanium closed-coil springs.

Authors:  Hwan-Hyung Park; Suk-Hwan Jung; Juil Yoon; Kwang Koo Jee; Jun Hyun Han; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Force-degradation pattern of six different orthodontic elastomeric chains.

Authors:  Ah Mirhashemi; A Saffarshahroudi; A Sodagar; M Atai
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2012-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.