Literature DB >> 8491275

Human stance on a sinusoidally translating platform: balance control by feedforward and feedback mechanisms.

V Dietz1, M Trippel, I K Ibrahim, W Berger.   

Abstract

With subjects standing on a treadmill moving sinusoidally backward and forward, recordings of electromyographic (EMG) leg and trunk muscle activity, head and joint movements and platform torque were made with the subjects' eyes open or closed. The sinusoidal frequency was changed, stepwise and randomly, between 0.5, 0.3 and 0.25 Hz. The amplitude of the deflection was constant at +/- 12 cm. During an adapted sinus cycle, the maximum leg muscle EMG activity was recorded in the tibialis anterior around the posterior turning point and in the gastrocnemius around the anterior turning point in the treadmill cycle. This activity was associated with a forward inclination of the body around the posterior point and a straightening of the body at the anterior point. Both the degree of body inclination and the corresponding EMG activity were dependent upon the sinusoidal frequency. The programmed adjustment of the body inclination was such that the result of inertial and gravitational forces acting on the body coincided with the axis of the body at the posterior turning point. At the anterior point, the adjustment was achieved mainly by strong activation of the leg extensors. The latencies of the compensatory muscle responses to a change in treadmill frequency were significantly shorter at the posterior point for the gastrocnemius than for the tibialis anterior, and at the anterior point for the tibialis anterior than for the gastrocnemius. No correlated changes were seen in the corresponding head and joint movements. The difference in latency can best be attributed to the different body postures during the sinusoid. Early activation of the gastrocnemius is required due to the forward-directed impulse to the inclined body at the posterior point, and of the tibialis anterior muscle due to the backward-directed impulse to the erect body at the anterior point. It is suggested that afferent input from extensor load receptors provides information about the position of the body's centre of gravity relative to the support surface and determines the generation of the EMG responses. Adaptation of both the EMG and biomechanical patterns to a new sinusoidal frequency of the treadmill occurred within four cycles after the change. Biomechanically, this was reflected as a change in the body posture. Vision did not significantly affect these changes. In conclusion, standing on a sinusoidally moving platform, the nervous system acts to control the position of the body's centre of gravity relative to the feet. Body posture is adjusted in such a way that the forces acting on the body during the treadmill movements become minimised.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8491275     DOI: 10.1007/BF00228405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  27 in total

1.  Body sway stabilization in human posture.

Authors:  M Kleiber; G A Horstmann; V Dietz
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.494

2.  Regulation of bipedal stance: dependency on "load" receptors.

Authors:  V Dietz; A Gollhofer; M Kleiber; M Trippel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Motor mechanisms: the role of the pyramidal system in motor control.

Authors:  V B Brooks; S D Stoney
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 19.318

4.  Adaptation of postural control to weightlessness.

Authors:  G Clément; V S Gurfinkel; F Lestienne; M I Lipshits; K E Popov
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Motor behavior underlying the control of an upside-down vertical posture.

Authors:  G Clément; D Rézette
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Visual contribution to rapid motor responses during postural control.

Authors:  L Nashner; A Berthoz
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1978-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Stabilization of human posture during induced oscillations of the body.

Authors:  H C Diener; J Dichgans; W Bruzek; H Selinka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The postural response of normal dogs to sinusoidal displacement.

Authors:  J M Brookhart; R E Talbott
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Neck, trunk and limb muscle responses during postural perturbations in humans.

Authors:  E A Keshner; M H Woollacott; B Debu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Developmental aspects of stance regulation, compensation and adaptation.

Authors:  W Berger; M Discher; M Trippel; I K Ibrahim; V Dietz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  16 in total

1.  Compensatory postural adaptations during continuous, variable amplitude perturbations reveal generalized rather than sequence-specific learning.

Authors:  K Van Ooteghem; J S Frank; F Allard; J J Buchanan; A R Oates; F B Horak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Feedforward ankle strategy of balance during quiet stance in adults.

Authors:  P Gatev; S Thomas; T Kepple; M Hallett
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Control of position and movement is simplified by combined muscle spindle and Golgi tendon organ feedback.

Authors:  Dinant A Kistemaker; Arthur J Knoek Van Soest; Jeremy D Wong; Isaac Kurtzer; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Time to reconfigure balancing behaviour in man: changing visual condition while riding a continuously moving platform.

Authors:  Alessandro Marco De Nunzio; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  The relevance of clinical balance assessment tools to differentiate balance deficits.

Authors:  M Mancini; F B Horak
Journal:  Eur J Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.874

6.  Aging does not affect generalized postural motor learning in response to variable amplitude oscillations of the support surface.

Authors:  Karen Van Ooteghem; James S Frank; Fran Allard; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Reactive Balance Responses After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Amanda Morris; Tallie Casucci; Mary M McFarland; Benjamin Cassidy; Ryan Pelo; Nicholas Kreter; Leland E Dibble; Peter C Fino
Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Kinematics and postural muscular activity during continuous oscillating platform movement in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Richard S Mills; Heidi Sveistrup
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Impact of ankle muscle fatigue and recovery on the anticipatory postural adjustments to externally initiated perturbations in dynamic postural control.

Authors:  Ashleigh Kennedy; Arnaud Guevel; Heidi Sveistrup
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Contribution of vision to postural behaviors during continuous support-surface translations.

Authors:  D Joseph Jilk; Seyed A Safavynia; Lena H Ting
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.