Literature DB >> 8486025

Bronchodilator delivery from Gentlehaler, a new low-velocity pressurized aerosol inhaler.

S P Newman1, S W Clarke.   

Abstract

We have compared radioaerosol deposition pattern and bronchodilator response following inhalation of 100 micrograms of albuterol from a correctly used conventional metered dose inhaler (MDI) to those from Gentlehaler, a new compact low-velocity pressurized aerosol device (Schering Corporation), in a group of ten asthmatic patients (mean baseline FEV1 52 percent; reversibility > 15 percent). Whole lung deposition (mean 18.8 percent of dose by conventional MDI, mean 19.9 percent of dose by Gentlehaler), regional lung deposition, and bronchodilator response were similar for the two devices, but oropharyngeal deposition was halved by Gentlehaler. The spray velocity from Gentlehaler was less than 2 m s-1 compared with a velocity of greater than 30 m s-1 commonly found in the conventional device. Gentlehaler may therefore play a valuable role in inhalation therapy, notably by reducing "cold Freon" problems (respiratory inhibition) in pressurized aerosol delivery, and by reducing oropharyngeal losses of inhaled corticosteroids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8486025     DOI: 10.1378/chest.103.5.1442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  10 in total

Review 1.  Can lung deposition data act as a surrogate for the clinical response to inhaled asthma drugs?

Authors:  S P Newman
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Methods to identify drug deposition in the lungs following inhalation.

Authors:  H Chrystyn
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Comparison of the extrapulmonary beta2-adrenoceptor responses and pharmacokinetics of salbutamol given by standard metered dose-inhaler and modified actuator device.

Authors:  D M Newnham; D G McDevitt; B J Lipworth
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Systematic review of clinical effectiveness of pressurised metered dose inhalers versus other hand held inhaler devices for delivering beta (2 )agonists bronchodilators in asthma.

Authors:  F S Ram; J Wright; D Brocklebank; J E White
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-20

Review 5.  Advances in metered dose inhaler technology: hardware development.

Authors:  Stephen W Stein; Poonam Sheth; P David Hodson; Paul B Myrdal
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 6.  Scientific Rationale for Determining the Bioequivalence of Inhaled Drugs.

Authors:  Omar S Usmani; Mathieu Molimard; Vaibhav Gaur; Jaideep Gogtay; Gur Jai Pal Singh; Geena Malhotra; Eric Derom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Studies using radiolabelled aerosols in children.

Authors:  M L Everard
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 8.  Spacer devices for metered dose inhalers.

Authors:  Stephen P Newman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Respirable dose delivery of fluticasone propionate from a small valved holding chamber, a compact breath actuated integrated vortex device and a metered dose inhaler.

Authors:  Arun Nair; Daniel Menzies; Martyn Barnes; Patricia Burns; Lesley McFarlane; Brian J Lipworth
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Instant velocity and consistency of emitted cloud change by the different levels of canister filling with Metered Dose Inhalers (MDIs), but not with Soft Mist Inhalers (SMIs): a bench study.

Authors:  Roberto W Dal Negro; Pietro Longo; Orestepaolo Villanis Ziani; Luca Bonadiman; Paola Turco
Journal:  Multidiscip Respir Med       Date:  2017-05-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.