Literature DB >> 8484896

Additivity of taste-specific effects of sucrose and quinine: microstructural analysis of ingestive behavior in rats.

S Hsiao1, R J Fan.   

Abstract

Effects of sweet and bitter tastes on ingestion were studied by timing licking responses. Twelve water-deprived rats were given 15-min access to sucrose (S) solutions (0.00%, 1.25%, 2.50%, and 5.00%) with and without quinine (0.01%) and to quinine (Q) solutions (0.00%, 0.0025%, 0.005%, and 0.01%) with and without sucrose (5.00%). Volume ingested and number of licks increased with S and decreased with Q. In response to S, the number of bursts increased, and interlick intervals lengthened. In response to Q, licks to ingest 1 ml of solution, burst number, and percentage of slow licks increased, and burst size decreased. When Q and S were mixed in the same solution, the pattern of ingestive responses manifested attributes of both tastes. Results suggest 2 separate, parallel systems that operate simultaneously to govern rats' licking behavior. One system expresses the effect of S on the pattern of ingestion and the other expresses the effects of Q.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8484896     DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.107.2.317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  28 in total

1.  Reduced palatability in drug-induced taste aversion: II. Aversive and rewarding unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  Joe Arthurs; Jian-You Lin; Leslie Renee Amodeo; Steve Reilly
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Preference for sucralose predicts behavioral responses to sweet and bittersweet tastants.

Authors:  Gregory C Loney; Ann-Marie Torregrossa; Chris Carballo; Lisa A Eckel
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  A comparison of the effects of the CB(1) receptor antagonist SR141716A, pre-feeding and changed palatability on the microstructure of ingestive behaviour.

Authors:  Zoë D Thornton-Jones; Guy A Kennett; Steven P Vickers; Peter G Clifton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Licking microstructure reveals rapid attenuation of neophobia.

Authors:  Kevin J Monk; Benjamin D Rubin; Jennifer C Keene; Donald B Katz
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Genetic control of oromotor phenotypes: A survey of licking and ingestive behaviors in highly diverse strains of mice.

Authors:  Steven J St John; Lu Lu; Robert W Williams; Jennifer Saputra; John D Boughter
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-04-12

6.  Reduced palatability in drug-induced taste aversion: I. Variations in the initial value of the conditioned stimulus.

Authors:  Jian-You Lin; Joe Arthurs; Leslie Renee Amodeo; Steve Reilly
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Microstructural analysis of negative anticipatory contrast: A reconsideration of the devaluation account.

Authors:  Rebecca L Wright; Gary Gilmour; Dominic M Dwyer
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Conditioned taste aversions: From poisons to pain to drugs of abuse.

Authors:  Jian-You Lin; Joe Arthurs; Steve Reilly
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

9.  Analysis of licking microstructure provides no evidence for a reduction in reward value following acute or sub-chronic phencyclidine administration.

Authors:  Emma S Lydall; Gary Gilmour; Dominic M Dwyer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 10.  Conditioned taste aversion, drugs of abuse and palatability.

Authors:  Jian-You Lin; Joe Arthurs; Steve Reilly
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.