Literature DB >> 23686348

Microstructural analysis of negative anticipatory contrast: A reconsideration of the devaluation account.

Rebecca L Wright1, Gary Gilmour, Dominic M Dwyer.   

Abstract

An animal's appetitive behavior is not a fixed response to current stimulation but can be affected by the anticipation of future events. For example, rats regularly given access to a moderately valued solution followed by a higher value solution (e.g., 4 % sucrose → 32 % sucrose) consume less of the initial solution than in control conditions where the initial solution is not followed by a higher value solution (e.g., 4 % sucrose → 4 % sucrose). Previous analyses have suggested that this negative anticipatory contrast effect does not depend on the "expectation" of a valuable stimulus producing a functional devaluation of a currently available stimulus of lesser value. In a within-subjects anticipatory contrast procedure, this study revealed that both consumption and the mean size of licking clusters were smaller for a 4 % sucrose solution on days when it preceded 32 % sucrose than on days when 4 % preceded 4 %. Since lick cluster size typically bears a positive monotonic relationship with the concentration of palatable solutions, this reduction is indicative of a decrease in the palatability/hedonic value of the solution subject to contrast. As such, we provide direct evidence that negative anticipatory contrast does produce a functional devaluation of the solution, thus challenging prevailing theoretical assumptions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23686348     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-013-0110-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  19 in total

1.  Reduced palatability in drug-induced taste aversion: II. Aversive and rewarding unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  Joe Arthurs; Jian-You Lin; Leslie Renee Amodeo; Steve Reilly
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Negative anticipatory contrast: does it involve anticipation of an impending reward?

Authors:  Barbara K A Onishi; Gilberto F Xavier
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Expression of flavor preference depends on type of test and on recent drinking history.

Authors:  Robert A Boakes; Lucy Albertella; Justin A Harris
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2007-07

Review 4.  The microstructure of ingestive behavior.

Authors:  J D Davis
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Analysis of licking microstructure provides no evidence for a reduction in reward value following acute or sub-chronic phencyclidine administration.

Authors:  Emma S Lydall; Gary Gilmour; Dominic M Dwyer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Food deprivation- and palatability-induced microstructural changes in ingestive behavior.

Authors:  J D Davis; M C Perez
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1993-01

7.  Taste neophobia and palatability: the pleasure of drinking.

Authors:  Jian-You Lin; Leslie Renee Amodeo; Joseph Arthurs; Steve Reilly
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-03-29

8.  Additivity of taste-specific effects of sucrose and quinine: microstructural analysis of ingestive behavior in rats.

Authors:  S Hsiao; R J Fan
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Microstructural analysis of ingestive behaviour reveals no contribution of palatability to the incomplete extinction of a conditioned taste aversion.

Authors:  Dominic M Dwyer
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Analytical issues in the evaluation of food deprivation and sucrose concentration effects on the microstructure of licking behavior in the rat.

Authors:  A C Spector; P A Klumpp; J M Kaplan
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.912

View more
  3 in total

1.  Temporal averaging across multiple response options: insight into the mechanisms underlying integration.

Authors:  Benjamin J De Corte; Matthew S Matell
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Lickometry: A novel and sensitive method for assessing functional deficits in rats after stroke.

Authors:  Jewel Ahmed; Dominic M Dwyer; Tracy D Farr; David J Harrison; Stephen B Dunnett; Rebecca C Trueman
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 6.200

3.  Predictive and motivational factors influencing anticipatory contrast: A comparison of contextual and gustatory predictors in food restricted and free-fed rats.

Authors:  Jessica Hayes; Celia Garau; Giulia Chiacchierini; Gonzalo P Urcelay; James E McCutcheon; John Apergis-Schoute
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2021-09-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.