Literature DB >> 8478852

A double-blind trial of the clinical effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields in osteoarthritis.

D H Trock1, A J Bollet, R H Dyer, L P Fielding, W K Miner, R Markoll.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Further evaluation of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF), which have been observed to produce numerous biological effects, and have been used to treat delayed union fractures for over a decade.
METHODS: In a pilot, double-blind randomized trial, 27 patients with osteoarthritis (OA), primarily of the knee, were treated with PEMF. Treatment consisted of 18 half-hour periods of exposure over about 1 month in a specially designed noncontact, air-coil device. Observations were made on 6 clinical variables at baseline, midpoint of therapy, end of treatment and one month later; 25 patients completed treatment.
RESULTS: An average improvement of 23-61% occurred in the clinical variables observed with active treatment, while 2 to 18% improvement was observed in these variables in placebo treated control patients. No toxicity was observed.
CONCLUSION: The decreased pain and improved functional performance of treated patients suggests that this configuration of PEMF has potential as an effective method of improving symptoms in patients with OA. This method warrants further clinical investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8478852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  24 in total

1.  Modification of osteoarthritis in the guinea pig with pulsed low-intensity ultrasound treatment.

Authors:  I Gurkan; A Ranganathan; X Yang; W E Horton; M Todman; J Huckle; N Pleshko; R G Spencer
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 2.  [Physical therapy of osteoarthritis].

Authors:  B Kladny
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.372

3.  Decrease in extracellular collagen crosslinking after NMR magnetic field application in skin fibroblasts.

Authors:  I Digel; E Kurulgan; Pt Linder; P Kayser; D Porst; G J Braem; K Zerlin; G M Artmann; A Temiz Artmann
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Flexible magnets are not effective in decreasing pain perception and recovery time after muscle microinjury.

Authors:  P A Borsa; C L Liggett
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Additional effect of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on knee osteoarthritis treatment: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Erkan Ozgüçlü; Alp Cetin; Meral Cetin; Emel Calp
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Effects of pulsed and sinusoid electromagnetic fields on human chondrocytes cultivated in a collagen matrix.

Authors:  Bernhard Schmidt-Rohlfing; Jiri Silny; Seth Woodruff; Karsten Gavenis
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 2.631

7.  Therapy with pulsed electromagnetic fields in aseptic loosening of total hip protheses: a prospective study.

Authors:  K Konrad; K Sevcic; K Földes; E Piroska; E Molnár
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Physical Stimulations for Bone and Cartilage Regeneration.

Authors:  Xiaobin Huang; Ritopa Das; Avi Patel; Thanh Duc Nguyen
Journal:  Regen Eng Transl Med       Date:  2018-06-25

9.  Therapeutic Magnets Do Not Affect Tissue Temperatures.

Authors:  Kathleen B. Sweeney; Mark A. Merrick; Christopher D. Ingersoll; John A. Swez
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  LASER versus electromagnetic field in treatment of hemarthrosis in children with hemophilia.

Authors:  Mohamed A Eid; Sobhy M Aly
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.161

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.