Literature DB >> 20473540

Additional effect of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on knee osteoarthritis treatment: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

Erkan Ozgüçlü1, Alp Cetin, Meral Cetin, Emel Calp.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate if pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) has additional effect on the classical physical treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) composed of hot pack, therapeutic ultrasound, and terminal isometric exercises. Forty patients (29 women and 11 men), ages 44 to 78 (mean age was 61.3 +/- 7.8 years) were included in our study. Patients with knee osteoarthritis [Kellgren-Lawrence criteria grade 2 and above and an average pain intensity of 40 or more on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS)] recruited from outpatient physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic were randomly assigned to receive PEMF or sham PEMF treatment in addition to their physical therapy. Both the PEMF and sham PEMF treatments being evaluated were 55 min/session, five sessions per week for 2 weeks. Each session comprise 20-min hot pack, 5-min therapeutic ultrasound, and 30-min PEMF or sham PEMF treatment applied to the knee of the patients. Patients were evaluated by the Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index and VAS at the baseline and at the end of treatment. Both PEMF and sham PEMF treatment groups showed statistically significant improvement in WOMAC pain and functional scores at the end of treatment (p < 0.001 in both groups). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in WOMAC pain, stiffness, and physical function scores after treatment (p = 0.906, p = 0.855, p = 0.809, respectively). There was neither difference in concomitant used acetaminophen dose in both groups (p = 0.289). The results of this study show that PEMF does not have additional effect on the classical physical treatment in reducing symptoms of knee OA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20473540     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-010-1453-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  25 in total

Review 1.  Electromagnetic fields and magnets. Investigational treatment for musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  D H Trock
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.670

Review 2.  Nonpharmacologic management of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Leena Sharma
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 3.  Stimulation of growth factor synthesis by electric and electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  Roy K Aaron; Barbara D Boyan; Deborah McK Ciombor; Zvi Schwartz; Bruce J Simon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  A double-blind trial of the clinical effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  D H Trock; A J Bollet; R H Dyer; L P Fielding; W K Miner; R Markoll
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  Magnetic pulse treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  N Pipitone; D L Scott
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.580

6.  Acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Turkish version of WOMAC osteoarthritis index.

Authors:  E H Tüzün; L Eker; A Aytar; A Daşkapan; M Bayramoğlu
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  Pulsed electromagnetic fields reduce knee osteoarthritic lesion progression in the aged Dunkin Hartley guinea pig.

Authors:  M Fini; G Giavaresi; P Torricelli; F Cavani; S Setti; V Canè; R Giardino
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2005-03-17       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Nitric oxide mediates the effects of pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation on the osteoblast proliferation and differentiation.

Authors:  Pericles Diniz; Kazuhisa Soejima; Gakuji Ito
Journal:  Nitric Oxide       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.427

9.  Effect of pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation on knee cartilage, subchondral and epyphiseal trabecular bone of aged Dunkin Hartley guinea pigs.

Authors:  Milena Fini; Paola Torricelli; Gianluca Giavaresi; Nicolò Nicoli Aldini; Francesco Cavani; Stefania Setti; Andrea Nicolini; Angelo Carpi; Roberto Giardino
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 6.529

Review 10.  Pulsed electromagnetic energy treatment offers no clinical benefit in reducing the pain of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christopher James McCarthy; Michael James Callaghan; Jacqueline Anne Oldham
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Coupling of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) therapy to molecular grounds of the cell.

Authors:  Richard Hw Funk
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  [Knee joint pain with signs of arthrosis].

Authors:  T T A Bender; M Marinova; L Radbruch; R Conrad; D Jobst; M Mücke
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  Pain and Functional Scores in Patients Affected by Knee OA after Treatment with Pulsed Electromagnetic and Magnetic Fields: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Marco Viganò; Carlotta Perucca Orfei; Enrico Ragni; Alessandra Colombini; Laura de Girolamo
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  BEMER Therapy Combined with Physiotherapy in Patients with Musculoskeletal Diseases: A Randomised, Controlled Double Blind Follow-Up Pilot Study.

Authors:  Franciska Gyulai; Katalin Rába; Ildikó Baranyai; Enikő Berkes; Tamás Bender
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.629

5.  Symptomatic Early Osteoarthritis of the Knee Treated With Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields: Two-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Alberto Gobbi; Dnyanesh Lad; Massimo Petrera; Georgios Karnatzikos
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Experimentally induced cartilage degeneration treated by pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation; an in vitro study on bovine cartilage.

Authors:  Francesca Veronesi; Milena Fini; Gianluca Giavaresi; Alessia Ongaro; Monica De Mattei; Agnese Pellati; Stefania Setti; Matilde Tschon
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 7.  Electromagnetic Field Therapy: A Rehabilitative Perspective in the Management of Musculoskeletal Pain - A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Teresa Paolucci; Letizia Pezzi; Antonello Marco Centra; Niki Giannandrea; Rosa Grazia Bellomo; Raoul Saggini
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.133

8.  Efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field in osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ziying Wu; Xiang Ding; Yilun Wang; Dongxing Xie; Guanghua Lei; Chao Zeng; Jie Wei; Jiatian Li; Hui Li; Tuo Yang; Yang Cui; Yilin Xiong
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  The use of an alternating magnetic field in the resorption of postoperative joint effusion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized double-blind controlled trial.

Authors:  Katarzyna Ogrodzka-Ciechanowicz; Grzegorz Głąb; Elżbieta Ciszek-Radwan; Jakub Ślusarski; Artur Gądek
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy for management of osteoarthritis-related pain, stiffness and physical function: clinical experience in the elderly.

Authors:  Tommaso Iannitti; Gregorio Fistetto; Anna Esposito; Valentina Rottigni; Beniamino Palmieri
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.