Literature DB >> 16558503

Flexible magnets are not effective in decreasing pain perception and recovery time after muscle microinjury.

P A Borsa1, C L Liggett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the therapeutic effects of flexible magnets on pain perception, intramuscular swelling, range of motion, and muscular strength in individuals with a muscle microinjury. DESIGN AND
SETTING: This experiment was a single-blind, placebo study using a repeated-measures design. Subjects performed an intense exercise protocol to induce a muscle microinjury. After pretreatment measurements were recorded, subjects were randomly assigned to an experimental (magnet), placebo (imitation magnet), or control (no magnet) group. Posttreatment measurements were repeated at 24, 48, and 72 hours.
SUBJECTS: Forty-five healthy subjects participated in the study. MEASUREMENTS: Subjects were measured repeatedly for pain perception, upper arm girth, range of motion, and static force production. Four separate univariate analyses of variances were used to reveal statistically significant mean (+/-SD) differences between variables over time. Interaction effects were analyzed using Scheffe post hoc analysis.
RESULTS: Analysis of variance revealed no statistically significant (P > .05) mean differences between conditions for any dependent pretreatment and posttreatment measurements. No significant interaction effects were demonstrated between conditions and times.
CONCLUSIONS: No significant therapeutic effects on pain control and muscular dysfunction were observed in subjects wearing flexible magnets.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 16558503      PMCID: PMC1320403     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  15 in total

1.  Analysis of subjective knee complaints using visual analog scales.

Authors:  F Flandry; J P Hunt; G C Terry; J C Hughston
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Viscoelastic properties of muscle-tendon units. The biomechanical effects of stretching.

Authors:  D C Taylor; J D Dalton; A V Seaber; W E Garrett
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 3.  Biological effects and safety aspects of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  F G Shellock
Journal:  Magn Reson Q       Date:  1989-10

4.  Thermoregulation in rodents exposed to high-intensity stationary magnetic fields.

Authors:  T S Tenforde
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.010

5.  The role of warmup in muscular injury prevention.

Authors:  M R Safran; W E Garrett; A V Seaber; R R Glisson; B M Ribbeck
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  The use of pulsing electromagnetic fields to achieve arthrodesis of the knee following failed total knee arthroplasty. A preliminary report.

Authors:  L U Bigliani; M P Rosenwasser; N Caulo; M M Schink; C A Bassett
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Effect of a static magnetic field on fracture healing in a rabbit radius. Preliminary results.

Authors:  G K Bruce; C R Howlett; R L Huckstep
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Stimulation of fracture healing with electromagnetic fields of extremely low frequency (EMF of ELF).

Authors:  O Wahlström
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy of persistent rotator cuff tendinitis. A double-blind controlled assessment.

Authors:  A Binder; G Parr; B Hazleman; S Fitton-Jackson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-03-31       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain.

Authors:  Donald D Price; Patricia A McGrath; Amir Rafii; Barbara Buckingham
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Static magnets for reducing pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Max H Pittler; Elizabeth M Brown; Edzard Ernst
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Symptomatic and functional responses to concentric-eccentric isokinetic versus eccentric-only isotonic exercise.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Parr; Joshua F Yarrow; Carolyn M Garbo; Paul A Borsa
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Therapeutic Magnets Do Not Affect Tissue Temperatures.

Authors:  Kathleen B. Sweeney; Mark A. Merrick; Christopher D. Ingersoll; John A. Swez
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Static magnetic field therapy: a critical review of treatment parameters.

Authors:  Agatha P Colbert; Helané Wahbeh; Noelle Harling; Erin Connelly; Heather C Schiffke; Cora Forsten; William L Gregory; Marko S Markov; James J Souder; Patricia Elmer; Valerie King
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 2.629

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.