Literature DB >> 8474803

Cost-effectiveness of screening and cryotherapy for threshold retinopathy of prematurity.

J Javitt1, R Dei Cas, Y P Chiang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is the leading cause of blindness among premature infants. A recent National Eye Institute-sponsored prospective, multicenter trial investigating the use of cryotherapy for treatment of ROP demonstrates a significant reduction in blindness and low vision for patients with sight-threatening (stage 3+) ROP.
METHOD: A microsimulation model is presented to determine the cost-effectiveness of cryotherapy for ROP. Simulations are performed for three subpopulations of premature infants with birth weights 500 through 749 g, 750 through 999 g, and 1000 through 1249 g, and for three screening strategies--weekly, biweekly, and monthly.
RESULTS: Appropriately timed screening for and treatment of ROP is predicted to result in a gain of 3899 to 4648 quality-adjusted-life-years and a net governmental budgetary savings of $38.3 to $64.9 million for each annual US birth cohort of 28,321 premature infants (500 through 1249 g). The cost per quality-adjusted-life-year gained is $2488 to $6045, depending on different screening strategies.
CONCLUSIONS: Of greatest importance is the finding that properly timed screening and treatment for ROP is not only cost saving but may save approximately 320 infants per year from a lifetime of blindness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8474803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  14 in total

1.  What do you do about ROP screening in "big" babies?

Authors:  G E Quinn
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Systemic effects of screening for retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  D E Laws; C Morton; M Weindling; D Clark
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Vision and quality-of-life.

Authors:  G C Brown
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1999

4.  Comparison of ultrasonic and ophthalmoscopic evaluation of retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  Danny H Kauffmann Jokl; Ronald H Silverman; Alan D Springer; Helen Towers; Steven Kane; Robert Lopez; Michael F Chiang; Harriet O Lloyd; Irene Barbazetto; Robyn Horowitz; Orit Vidne
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.402

Review 5.  Value-based medicine and ophthalmology: an appraisal of cost-utility analyses.

Authors:  Gary C Brown; Melissa M Brown; Sanjay Sharma; Heidi Brown; Lindsay Smithen; David B Leeser; George Beauchamp
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2004

6.  Computer-assisted quantification of vascular tortuosity in retinopathy of prematurity (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  David K Wallace
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2007

7.  Screening for retinopathy of prematurity after surfactant treatment.

Authors:  D Brunner-Di Pietro; E Bossi; F Koerner
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.183

8.  Stanford University Network for Diagnosis of Retinopathy of Prematurity (SUNDROP): 18-month experience with telemedicine screening.

Authors:  Ruwan A Silva; Yohko Murakami; Atul Jain; Jarel Gandhi; Eleonora M Lad; Darius M Moshfeghi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 9.  Image analysis for retinopathy of prematurity diagnosis.

Authors:  Michael F Chiang; Rony Gelman; M Elena Martinez-Perez; Yunling E Du; Daniel S Casper; Leanne M Currie; Payal D Shah; Justin Starren; John T Flynn
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.220

10.  A Comparison of Strategies for Retinopathy of Prematurity Detection.

Authors:  Alex R Kemper; Lisa A Prosser; Kelly C Wade; Michael X Repka; Gui-shuang Ying; Agnieshka Baumritter; Graham E Quinn
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 7.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.