PURPOSE: To ascertain the extent to which ophthalmologic interventions have been evaluated in value-based medicine format. METHODS: Retrospective literature review. Papers in the healthcare literature utilizing cost-utility analysis were reviewed by researchers at the Center for Value-Based Medicine, Flourtown, Pennsylvania. A literature review of papers addressing the cost-utility analysis of ophthalmologic procedures in the United States over a 12-year period from 1992 to 2003 was undertaken using the National Library of Medicine and EMBASE databases. The cost-utility of ophthalmologic interventions in inflation-adjusted (real) year 2003 US dollars expended per quality-adjusted life-year (dollars/QALY) was ascertained in all instances. RESULTS: A total of 19 papers were found, including a total of 25 interventions. The median cost-utility of ophthalmologic interventions was 5,219 dollars/QALY, with a range from 746 dollars/QALY to 6.5 million dollars/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of ophthalmologic interventions are especially cost-effective by conventional standards. This is because of the substantial value that ophthalmologic interventions confer to patients with eye diseases for the resources expended.
PURPOSE: To ascertain the extent to which ophthalmologic interventions have been evaluated in value-based medicine format. METHODS: Retrospective literature review. Papers in the healthcare literature utilizing cost-utility analysis were reviewed by researchers at the Center for Value-Based Medicine, Flourtown, Pennsylvania. A literature review of papers addressing the cost-utility analysis of ophthalmologic procedures in the United States over a 12-year period from 1992 to 2003 was undertaken using the National Library of Medicine and EMBASE databases. The cost-utility of ophthalmologic interventions in inflation-adjusted (real) year 2003 US dollars expended per quality-adjusted life-year (dollars/QALY) was ascertained in all instances. RESULTS: A total of 19 papers were found, including a total of 25 interventions. The median cost-utility of ophthalmologic interventions was 5,219 dollars/QALY, with a range from 746 dollars/QALY to 6.5 million dollars/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of ophthalmologic interventions are especially cost-effective by conventional standards. This is because of the substantial value that ophthalmologic interventions confer to patients with eye diseases for the resources expended.