Literature DB >> 8473842

Dual-task interference and the cerebral hemispheres.

H Pashler1, S O'Brien.   

Abstract

It has been argued that dual-task interference is reduced when the two cerebral hemispheres can carry out the two tasks independently. Evidence for this idea has arisen from studies involving manipulations such as lateralized stimulation or response, or requiring mental operations believed to depend primarily on a particular hemisphere. However, these studies have typically involved a very limited degree of response uncertainty, which appears critical in producing the most extreme dual-task interference (the psychological refractory effect). Pairs of tasks with independent response uncertainty were examined, and various manipulations were used to promote hemispheric task separation. Dual-task interference was not modulated by these manipulations. It seems likely that response selection represents a central bottleneck, in the sense that this process cannot operate simultaneously and independently in the two hemispheres.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8473842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  11 in total

1.  Approaching objects cause confusion in patients with Alzheimer's disease regarding their direction of self-movement.

Authors:  Mark Mapstone; Charles J Duffy
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  A laboratory study on anticipatory movement in laparoscopic surgery: a behavioral indicator for team collaboration.

Authors:  B Zheng; L L Swanström; C L MacKenzie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Is the psychological refractory period effect for ideomotor compatible tasks eliminated by speed-stress instructions?

Authors:  Yun Kyoung Shin; Yang Seok Cho; Mei-Ching Lien; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-05-23

4.  Holding a manual response sequence in memory can disrupt vocal responses that share semantic features with the manual response.

Authors:  Lisa Renee Fournier; Matthew D Wiediger; Ryan McMeans; Paul S Mattson; Joy Kirkwood; Theibot Herzog
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-09-02

Review 5.  The bottleneck of the psychological refractory period effect involves timing of response initiation rather than response selection.

Authors:  Stuart T Klapp; Dana Maslovat; Richard J Jagacinski
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

6.  Path perturbation detection tasks reduce MSTd neuronal self-movement heading responses.

Authors:  William K Page; Charles J Duffy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Telephone conversation impairs sustained visual attention via a central bottleneck.

Authors:  Melina A Kunar; Randall Carter; Michael Cohen; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-12

8.  Vision and audition do not share attentional resources in sustained tasks.

Authors:  Roberto Arrighi; Roy Lunardi; David Burr
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-04-05

9.  Hemispheric biases and the control of visuospatial attention: an ERP study.

Authors:  Kevin M Spencer; Marie T Banich
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Dynamic construction of a coherent attentional state in a prefrontal cell population.

Authors:  Mikiko Kadohisa; Philippe Petrov; Mark Stokes; Natasha Sigala; Mark Buckley; David Gaffan; Makoto Kusunoki; John Duncan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.