Literature DB >> 19001580

Telephone conversation impairs sustained visual attention via a central bottleneck.

Melina A Kunar1, Randall Carter, Michael Cohen, Todd S Horowitz.   

Abstract

Recent research has shown that holding telephone conversations disrupts one's driving ability. We asked whether this effect could be attributed to a visual attention impairment. In Experiment 1, participants conversed on a telephone or listened to a narrative while engaged in multiple object tracking (MOT), a task requiring sustained visual attention. We found that MOT was disrupted in the telephone conversation condition, relative to single-task MOT performance, but that listening to a narrative had no effect. In Experiment 2, we asked which component of conversation might be interfering with MOT performance. We replicated the conversation and single-task conditions of Experiment 1 and added two conditions in which participants heard a sequence of words over a telephone. In the shadowing condition, participants simply repeated each word in the sequence. In the generation condition, participants were asked to generate a new word based on each word in the sequence. Word generation interfered with MOT performance, but shadowing did not. The data indicate that telephone conversation disrupts attention at a central stage, the act of generating verbal stimuli, rather than at a peripheral stage, such as listening or speaking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19001580      PMCID: PMC2684625          DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  22 in total

1.  Visual encoding of patterns is subject to dual-task interference.

Authors:  R Dell'Acqua; P Jolicoeur
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-03

2.  Driven to distraction: dual-Task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone.

Authors:  D L Strayer; W A Johnston
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-11

3.  Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving.

Authors:  David L Strayer; Frank A Drews; William A Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2003-03

4.  Central interference in driving: is there any stopping the psychological refractory period?

Authors:  Jonathan Levy; Harold Pashler; Erwin Boer
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-03

5.  A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver.

Authors:  David L Strayer; Frank A Drews; Dennis J Crouch
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  Tracking unique objects.

Authors:  Todd S Horowitz; Sarah B Klieger; David E Fencsik; Kevin K Yang; George A Alvarez; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-02

7.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

8.  Multiple resources in divided attention: a cross-modal test of the independence of hemispheric resources.

Authors:  C M Herdman; A Friedman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism.

Authors:  Z W Pylyshyn; R W Storm
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1988

10.  Distinct capacity limits for attention and working memory: Evidence from attentive tracking and visual working memory paradigms.

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; René Marois
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-06
View more
  15 in total

1.  Can we improve clinical prediction of at-risk older drivers?

Authors:  Alex R Bowers; R Julius Anastasio; Sarah S Sheldon; Margaret G O'Connor; Ann M Hollis; Piers D Howe; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2013-07-16

2.  Talking and driving: applications of crossmodal action reveal a special role for spatial language.

Authors:  Paul Atchley; Jeff Dressel; Todd C Jones; Rebecca A Burson; David Marshall
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-06-28

Review 3.  The role of saccades in multitasking: towards an output-related view of eye movements.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-07-01

Review 4.  What is the Bandwidth of Perceptual Experience?

Authors:  Michael A Cohen; Daniel C Dennett; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Interference between conversation and a concurrent visuomotor task.

Authors:  Timothy W Boiteau; Patrick S Malone; Sara A Peters; Amit Almor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-02-18

6.  The Effect of Cognitive Load on Auditory Susceptibility During Automated Driving.

Authors:  Remo M A Van der Heiden; J Leon Kenemans; Stella F Donker; Christian P Janssen
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  The influence of attention on value integration.

Authors:  Melina A Kunar; Derrick G Watson; Konstantinos Tsetsos; Nick Chater
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 8.  Can Limitations of Visuospatial Attention Be Circumvented? A Review.

Authors:  Basil Wahn; Peter König
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-27

9.  The sound of a mobile phone ringing affects the complex reaction time of its owner.

Authors:  Radoslaw Zajdel; Justyna Zajdel; Anna Zwolińska; Janusz Smigielski; Piotr Beling; Tomasz Cegliński; Dariusz Nowak
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.318

10.  Effect of bilingualism on visual tracking attention and resistance to distraction.

Authors:  Ana Janic; Patrick Cavanagh; Josée Rivest
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.