Literature DB >> 8473837

Contextual processing of multidimensional and unidimensional auditory stimuli.

L E Marks1.   

Abstract

Stimulus context (the distribution of stimulus values) can strongly affect both perception and judgment. In 14 experiments, the method of magnitude estimation revealed 2 fundamentally different kinds of context effect in loudness. An assimilative effect dominated when stimuli varied unidimensionally (in intensity only). But a contrasting, or adaptation-like, effect dominated when stimuli varied multidimensionally (in frequency and intensity). In Experiment 15, direct loudness comparison revealed a potent, adaptational process specific to the signal frequency. Taken together, these and other results are compatible with the view that loudness perception and judgment reflect the net outcome of 2 different contextual processes: a relatively early (though probably not peripheral) process of perceptual adaptation and a later process of response-dependent assimilation.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8473837     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.19.2.227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  9 in total

1.  Recalibration of the auditory continuity illusion: sensory and decisional effects.

Authors:  Lars Riecke; Christophe Micheyl; Mieke Vanbussel; Claudia S Schreiner; Daniel Mendelsohn; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Is memory for stimulus magnitude Bayesian?

Authors:  Kevin M Sailor; Miriam Antoine
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-07

3.  Hedonic contrast and condensation: good stimuli make mediocre stimuli less good and less different.

Authors:  Debra A Zellner; Dawn Allen; Monique Henley; Scott Parker
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

4.  Feasibility of interleaved Bayesian adaptive procedures in estimating the equal-loudness contour.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Celia Zhang; Zhuohuang Zhang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Context effects in judging taste intensity: a comparison of variable line and category rating methods.

Authors:  J A Stillman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-10

6.  Context effects, reliability, and internal consistency of intermodal joint scaling.

Authors:  S Nordin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-02

7.  Contextual Effects in Judgments of Taste Intensity: No Assimilation, Sometimes Contrast.

Authors:  Timothy G Shepard; Adam Y Shavit; Maria G Veldhuizen; Lawrence E Marks
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Bayesian inference underlies the contraction bias in delayed comparison tasks.

Authors:  Paymon Ashourian; Yonatan Loewenstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Neural Representation of Loudness: Cortical Evoked Potentials in an Induced Loudness Reduction Experiment.

Authors:  Florian H Schmidt; Manfred Mauermann; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.