Literature DB >> 8255710

Context effects in judging taste intensity: a comparison of variable line and category rating methods.

J A Stillman1.   

Abstract

The effect of stimulus range and stimulus spacing was examined when subjects registered the perceived intensity of sweet liquids using either a matching procedure (Experiment 1) or category rating (Experiment 2). The matching procedure is conceptually similar to absolute magnitude estimation, whereby subjects match their impression of number size to their impression of the subjective magnitude of a stimulus. In Experiment 1, subjects matched their impression of the stimulus to their impression of the magnitude of the length of a continuously variable line under their control. In Experiment 2, subjects rated perceived sweetness on a vertical 13-point scale with five equally spaced verbal labels. In both experiments, three sets of four sucrose concentrations were employed. In two of these sets, a set of weaker solutions and a set of stronger solutions, concentrations were separated by 0.25 log units. In a third set, which spanned the range of concentrations used in the other two sets (0.87 to 27.36% w/v), solutions were separated by 0.5 log units. An examination of both individual and group data showed the matching procedure to be less susceptible to a range bias than the rating procedure. In particular, a single intensity function accommodated data from individual ranges better when the matching procedure was used than when the rating procedure was used. No effect of stimulus spacing was evident in the data from either procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8255710     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  23 in total

Review 1.  On colored-hearing synesthesia: cross-modal translations of sensory dimensions.

Authors:  L E Marks
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  SPATIAL STEREOTYPES OF FOUR DIMENSIONS OF PURE TONE.

Authors:  S A MUDD
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1963-10

3.  Does stimulus context affect loudness or only loudness judgments?

Authors:  B Schneider; S Parker
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-11

Review 4.  Psychophysical scaling.

Authors:  G A Gescheider
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  On cross-modal similarity: auditory-visual interactions in speeded discrimination.

Authors:  L E Marks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Remembrance of sounds past: memory and psychophysical scaling.

Authors:  L M Ward
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Reply to Zwislocki's views on "absolute" scaling.

Authors:  B A Mellers
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-10

8.  A JND-scale/category-scale convergence in taste.

Authors:  R L McBride
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-07

9.  Group and individual relations between sensation magnitudes and their numerical estimates.

Authors:  J J Zwislocki
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-05

10.  Models for biases in judging sensory magnitude.

Authors:  E C Poulton
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  2 in total

1.  Determinants of cumulative successive contrast in saltiness intensity judgments.

Authors:  H N Schifferstein; I M Oudejans
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-07

2.  Contextual effects in difference judgments.

Authors:  H N Schifferstein
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.