Literature DB >> 8473610

Detection of temporal gaps in sinusoids: effects of frequency and level.

B C Moore1, R W Peters, B R Glasberg.   

Abstract

Thresholds for the detection of gaps in sinusoidal signals were measured as a function of frequency (100-2000 Hz) and level (25-85 dB SPL) in 11 normally hearing subjects. The sinusoids were presented in a background noise intended to mask spectral splatter associated with the gap. In a separate experiment, auditory filter shapes and detection efficiency were estimated for the same 11 subjects using the notched-noise method, at center frequencies of 100, 200, 400, and 800 Hz. Gap thresholds varied only slightly with frequency over the range 400-2000 Hz, but increased markedly at 200 and 100 Hz. At all center frequencies, gap thresholds were almost invariant with level for levels above 55 dB SPL. Gap thresholds increased at low levels, reaching values about 50% greater than their asymptotic values at a sensation level of about 20 dB. The decrease in auditory filter bandwidth with decreasing center frequency does not seem sufficient to account for the increase in gap thresholds. Also, individual gap thresholds at a given center frequency were not significantly correlated with the bandwidth of the auditory filter at that center frequency, as would be expected if the auditory filter played a role in limiting gap detection. Detection efficiency decreased with decreasing center frequency. Individual differences in detection efficiency were significantly correlated with gap thresholds. However, changes in detection efficiency with frequency do not seem to be of the right form to account for the increase in gap thresholds at low frequencies. It seems likely that there is a central sliding temporal integrator which integrates over longer times at lower center frequencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8473610     DOI: 10.1121/1.406815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

Review 1.  Basic auditory processes involved in the analysis of speech sounds.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The effect of noise fluctuation and spectral bandwidth on gap detection.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; Erol J Ozmeral; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory and tactile gap discrimination by observers with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne; Timothy J Villabona
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Gap Detection in School-Age Children and Adults: Center Frequency and Ramp Duration.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Heather L Porter; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 5.  Review article: review of the literature on temporal resolution in listeners with cochlear hearing impairment: a critical assessment of the role of suprathreshold deficits.

Authors:  Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Patrick M Zurek
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-12-11

6.  Age-dependent changes of gap detection in the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus).

Authors:  Ingo Hamann; Otto Gleich; Georg M Klump; Malte C Kittel; Jürgen Strutz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-10-16

7.  The Gap Detection Test: Can It Be Used to Diagnose Tinnitus?

Authors:  Kris Boyen; Deniz Başkent; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Evaluation of Temporal Difference Limen in Preoperative Non-Invasive Ear Canal Audiometry as a Predictive Factor for Speech Perception after Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Saku T Sinkkonen; Lars Kronlund; Johannes Hautamäki; Jussi Jero; Antti A Aarnisalo; Erna Kentala
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2014-02-27

9.  Neural tracking of the musical beat is enhanced by low-frequency sounds.

Authors:  Tomas Lenc; Peter E Keller; Manuel Varlet; Sylvie Nozaradan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Auditory processing performance in blind people.

Authors:  Ludmilla Vilas Boas; Lílian Muniz; Silvio da Silva Caldas Neto; Mariana de Carvalho Leal Gouveia
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.