Literature DB >> 8470589

Volumetric flow rates in the portal venous system: measurement with cine phase-contrast MR imaging.

D J Burkart1, C D Johnson, M J Morton, R L Wolf, R L Ehman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to (1) validate the accuracy of cine phase-contrast MR flow measurements within the portal vein, (2) develop a suitable protocol for using this method to measure volumetric flow rate in the portal venous system, and (3) use this protocol, with Doppler sonography as a reference, to measure portal venous flow in healthy volunteers and in patients with protal venous hypertension. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Flow determinations were obtained in a model of fluid movement approximating blood-flow conditions in the portal venous system. A suitable protocol was based on consideration of the theoretical effects of (1) spatial resolution, (2) obliquity of the imaging plane to the direction of flow, and (3) signal-to-noise ratio of the signed quantitative velocity images (in three volunteers) on the accuracy and precision of flow measurements. This protocol was used to obtain cine phase-contrast MR images of the portal venous system in five volunteers and six patients.
RESULTS: Values obtained with a flow phantom showed good accuracy of cine phase-contrast-measured vs actual volumetric flow rate (r = .995; p = .0001; MR rate = [0.94 x actual rate] + 65.6 ml/min; standard error of the y estimate = 67.3 ml/min). Velocity encoding and section thickness substantially influenced the signal-to-noise ratio of the velocity images, whereas flip angle and matrix size had only minimal effect. In volunteers and patients, portal volumetric flow rates determined by using MR images and Doppler sonography showed good correlation (r = .94; p = .0003).
CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that cine phase-contrast MR imaging is a practical noninvasive method for measuring volumetric flow rates in the portal venous system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8470589     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.160.5.8470589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  12 in total

Review 1.  Four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging in cirrhosis.

Authors:  Zoran Stankovic
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Four-dimensional velocity mapping of the hepatic and splanchnic vasculature with radial sampling at 3 tesla: a feasibility study in portal hypertension.

Authors:  A Frydrychowicz; B R Landgraf; E Niespodzany; R W Verma; A Roldán-Alzate; K M Johnson; O Wieben; S B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Reproducibility study of four-dimensional flow MRI of arterial and portal venous liver hemodynamics: influence of spatio-temporal resolution.

Authors:  Zoran Stankovic; Bernd Jung; Jeremy Collins; Maximilian F Russe; James Carr; Wulf Euringer; Lena Stehlin; Zoltan Csatari; Peter C Strohm; Mathias Langer; Michael Markl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Noninvasive imaging assessment of portal hypertension.

Authors:  Paul Kennedy; Octavia Bane; Stefanie J Hectors; Aaron Fischman; Thomas Schiano; Sara Lewis; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-09-14

5.  Evaluation of ultrafast phase-contrast imaging in the thoracic aorta.

Authors:  J F Debatin; C P Davis; J Felblinger; G C McKinnon
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Quantitation of flow in the superior sagittal sinus performed with cine phase-contrast MR imaging of healthy and achondroplastic children.

Authors:  N Hirabuki; Y Watanabe; T Mano; N Fujita; H Tanaka; T Ueguchi; H Nakamura
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Measuring aortic pulse wave velocity using high-field cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of techniques.

Authors:  El-Sayed H Ibrahim; Kevin R Johnson; Alan B Miller; Jean M Shaffer; Richard D White
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Portal blood flow in the presence or absence of diffuse liver disease: measurement by phase contrast MR imaging.

Authors:  N Kashitani; S Kimoto; M Tsunoda; T Ito; T Tsuji; A Ono; Y Hiraki
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1995 May-Jun

9.  Effect of Model Thrombus Volume and Elastic Modulus on Magnetomotive Ultrasound Signal Under Pulsatile Flow.

Authors:  Benjamin E Levy; Md Murad Hossain; Justin M Sierchio; Diwash Thapa; Caterina M Gallippi; Amy L Oldenburg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  Respiratory self-gating for free-breathing abdominal phase-contrast blood flow measurements.

Authors:  Ning Jin; Robert J Lewandowski; Reed A Omary; Andrew C Larson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.