Literature DB >> 8468289

Relationships between C4 dicarboxylic acid transport and chemotaxis in Rhizobium meliloti.

J B Robinson1, W D Bauer.   

Abstract

The relationship between chemotaxis and transport of C4 dicarboxylic acids was analyzed with Rhizobium meliloti dct mutants defective in one or all of the genes required for dicarboxylic acid transport. Succinate, malate, and fumarate were moderately potent chemoattractants for wild-type R. meliloti and appeared to share a common chemoreceptor. While dicarboxylate transport is inducible, taxis to succinate was shown to be constitutive. Mutations in the dctA and dctB genes both resulted in the reduction, but not elimination, of chemotactic responses to succinate, indicating that transport via DctA or chemosensing via DctB is not essential for C4 dicarboxylate taxis, although they appear to contribute to it. Mutations in dctD and rpoN genes did not affect taxis to succinate. Aspartate, which is also transported by the dicarboxylate transport system, elicited strong chemotactic responses via a chemoreceptor distinct from the succinate-malate-fumarate receptor. Taxis to aspartate was unaltered in dctA and dctB mutants but was considerably reduced in both dctD and rpoN mutants, indicating that aspartate taxis is strongly dependent on elements responsible for transcriptional activation of dctA. Methylation and methanol release experiments failed to show a significant increase in methyl esterification of R. meliloti proteins in response to any of the attractants tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8468289      PMCID: PMC204516          DOI: 10.1128/jb.175.8.2284-2291.1993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  40 in total

1.  Attractants and repellents influence methylation and demethylation of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins in an extract of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S J Kleene; A C Hobson; J Adler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A method for measuring chemotaxis and use of the method to determine optimum conditions for chemotaxis by Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J Adler
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1973-01

3.  Separation of signal transduction and adaptation functions of the aspartate receptor in bacterial sensing.

Authors:  A F Russo; D E Koshland
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Multiple methylation of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins during adaptation of E. coli to chemical stimuli.

Authors:  P Engström; G L Hazelbauer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Identification of a protein methyltransferase as the cheR gene product in the bacterial sensing system.

Authors:  W R Springer; D E Koshland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Chemotaxis to aromatic and hydroaromatic acids: comparison of Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Rhizobium trifolii.

Authors:  D Parke; M Rivelli; L N Ornston
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Chemotaxis of Salmonella typhimurium to amino acids and some sugars.

Authors:  T Melton; P E Hartman; J P Stratis; T L Lee; A T Davis
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Involvement of transport in Rhodobacter sphaeroides chemotaxis.

Authors:  C J Ingham; J P Armitage
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Chemotaxis toward amino acids in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  R Mesibov; J Adler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 10.  Bacterial chemotaxis: biochemistry of behavior in a single cell.

Authors:  G W Ordal
Journal:  Crit Rev Microbiol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 7.624

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  More than one way to sense chemicals.

Authors:  G Alexandre; I B Zhulin
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 2.  Chemotaxis signaling systems in model beneficial plant-bacteria associations.

Authors:  Birgit E Scharf; Michael F Hynes; Gladys M Alexandre
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Starvation-Induced Changes in Motility, Chemotaxis, and Flagellation of Rhizobium meliloti

Authors: 
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Functional analysis of nine putative chemoreceptor proteins in Sinorhizobium meliloti.

Authors:  Veronika M Meier; Paul Muschler; Birgit E Scharf
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Identification of a chemoreceptor for tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates: differential chemotactic response towards receptor ligands.

Authors:  Jesús Lacal; Carlos Alfonso; Xianxian Liu; Rebecca E Parales; Bertrand Morel; Francisco Conejero-Lara; Germán Rivas; Estrella Duque; Juan L Ramos; Tino Krell
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Detection of and response to signals involved in host-microbe interactions by plant-associated bacteria.

Authors:  Anja Brencic; Stephen C Winans
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 11.056

7.  Comparative analyses imply that the enigmatic Sigma factor 54 is a central controller of the bacterial exterior.

Authors:  Christof Francke; Tom Groot Kormelink; Yanick Hagemeijer; Lex Overmars; Vincent Sluijter; Roy Moezelaar; Roland J Siezen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.969

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.