Literature DB >> 20498372

Identification of a chemoreceptor for tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates: differential chemotactic response towards receptor ligands.

Jesús Lacal1, Carlos Alfonso, Xianxian Liu, Rebecca E Parales, Bertrand Morel, Francisco Conejero-Lara, Germán Rivas, Estrella Duque, Juan L Ramos, Tino Krell.   

Abstract

We report the identification of McpS as the specific chemoreceptor for 6 tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle intermediates and butyrate in Pseudomonas putida. The analysis of the bacterial mutant deficient in mcpS and complementation assays demonstrate that McpS is the only chemoreceptor of TCA cycle intermediates in the strain under study. TCA cycle intermediates are abundantly present in root exudates, and taxis toward these compounds is proposed to facilitate the access to carbon sources. McpS has an unusually large ligand-binding domain (LBD) that is un-annotated in InterPro and is predicted to contain 6 helices. The ligand profile of McpS was determined by isothermal titration calorimetry of purified recombinant LBD (McpS-LBD). McpS recognizes TCA cycle intermediates but does not bind very close structural homologues and derivatives like maleate, aspartate, or tricarballylate. This implies that functional similarity of ligands, such as being part of the same pathway, and not structural similarity is the primary element, which has driven the evolution of receptor specificity. The magnitude of chemotactic responses toward these 7 chemoattractants, as determined by qualitative and quantitative chemotaxis assays, differed largely. Ligands that cause a strong chemotactic response (malate, succinate, and fumarate) were found by differential scanning calorimetry to increase significantly the midpoint of protein unfolding (T(m)) and unfolding enthalpy (DeltaH) of McpS-LBD. Equilibrium sedimentation studies show that malate, the chemoattractant that causes the strongest chemotactic response, stabilizes the dimeric state of McpS-LBD. In this respect clear parallels exist to the Tar receptor and other eukaryotic receptors, which are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20498372      PMCID: PMC2906306          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.110403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  52 in total

1.  A piston model for transmembrane signaling of the aspartate receptor.

Authors:  K M Ottemann; W Xiao; Y K Shin; D E Koshland
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-09-10       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Cache - a signaling domain common to animal Ca(2+)-channel subunits and a class of prokaryotic chemotaxis receptors.

Authors:  V Anantharaman; L Aravind
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 13.807

Review 3.  Molecular determinants of rhizosphere colonization by Pseudomonas.

Authors:  B J Lugtenberg; L Dekkers; G V Bloemberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Phytopathol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 13.078

Review 4.  The superfamily of chemotaxis transducers: from physiology to genomics and back.

Authors:  I B Zhulin
Journal:  Adv Microb Physiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.517

5.  Propagating conformational changes over long (and short) distances in proteins.

Authors:  E W Yu; D E Koshland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Proline catabolism by Pseudomonas putida: cloning, characterization, and expression of the put genes in the presence of root exudates.

Authors:  S Vílchez; L Molina; C Ramos; J L Ramos
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Mutations that affect ligand binding to the Escherichia coli aspartate receptor: implications for transmembrane signaling.

Authors:  A M Björkman; P Dunten; M O Sandgren; V N Dwarakanath; S L Mowbray
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-10-20       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Toluene-degrading bacteria are chemotactic towards the environmental pollutants benzene, toluene, and trichloroethylene.

Authors:  R E Parales; J L Ditty; C S Harwood
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Size-distribution analysis of macromolecules by sedimentation velocity ultracentrifugation and lamm equation modeling.

Authors:  P Schuck
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Site-directed solid-state NMR measurement of a ligand-induced conformational change in the serine bacterial chemoreceptor.

Authors:  O J Murphy ; F A Kovacs; E L Sicard; L K Thompson
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  32 in total

1.  Crystallization and crystallographic analysis of the ligand-binding domain of the Pseudomonas putida chemoreceptor McpS in complex with malate and succinate.

Authors:  J A Gavira; J Lacal; J L Ramos; J M García-Ruiz; T Krell; E Pineda-Molina
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun       Date:  2012-03-27

Review 2.  Identification of ligands for bacterial sensor proteins.

Authors:  Matilde Fernández; Bertrand Morel; Andrés Corral-Lugo; Miriam Rico-Jiménez; David Martín-Mora; Diana López-Farfán; José Antonio Reyes-Darias; Miguel A Matilla; Álvaro Ortega; Tino Krell
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.886

3.  Identification of the mcpA and mcpM genes, encoding methyl-accepting proteins involved in amino acid and l-malate chemotaxis, and involvement of McpM-mediated chemotaxis in plant infection by Ralstonia pseudosolanacearum (formerly Ralstonia solanacearum phylotypes I and III).

Authors:  Akiko Hida; Shota Oku; Takeru Kawasaki; Yutaka Nakashimada; Takahisa Tajima; Junichi Kato
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  The HBM domain: introducing bimodularity to bacterial sensing.

Authors:  Álvaro Ortega; Tino Krell
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Sinorhizobium meliloti chemoreceptor McpU mediates chemotaxis toward host plant exudates through direct proline sensing.

Authors:  Benjamin A Webb; Sherry Hildreth; Richard F Helm; Birgit E Scharf
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  The expression of many chemoreceptor genes depends on the cognate chemoeffector as well as on the growth medium and phase.

Authors:  Diana López-Farfán; José Antonio Reyes-Darias; Tino Krell
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.886

7.  Identification of a Chemoreceptor for C2 and C3 Carboxylic Acids.

Authors:  Vanina García; Jose-Antonio Reyes-Darias; David Martín-Mora; Bertrand Morel; Miguel A Matilla; Tino Krell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  The ligand-binding domain of a chemoreceptor from Comamonas testosteroni has a previously unknown homotrimeric structure.

Authors:  Yuan Hong; Zhou Huang; Lu Guo; Bin Ni; Cheng-Ying Jiang; Xiao-Jing Li; Yan-Jie Hou; Wen-Si Yang; Da-Cheng Wang; Igor B Zhulin; Shuang-Jiang Liu; De-Feng Li
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 3.501

9.  Pseudomonas putida F1 has multiple chemoreceptors with overlapping specificity for organic acids.

Authors:  Rebecca E Parales; Rita A Luu; Grischa Y Chen; Xianxian Liu; Victoria Wu; Pamela Lin; Jonathan G Hughes; Vasyl Nesteryuk; Juanito V Parales; Jayna L Ditty
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.777

10.  Transcriptomic analysis of the role of carboxylic acids in metabolite signaling in Arabidopsis leaves.

Authors:  Iris Finkemeier; Ann-Christine König; William Heard; Adriano Nunes-Nesi; Phuong Anh Pham; Dario Leister; Alisdair R Fernie; Lee J Sweetlove
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.