Literature DB >> 8463840

Recoverable and nonrecoverable deficits in conditioned responses after cerebellar cortical lesions.

J A Harvey1, J P Welsh, C H Yeo, A G Romano.   

Abstract

This study reexamined the effects of unilateral damage to cerebellar hemispheral lobule VI on the rabbit's conditioned nictitating membrane (NM) response. Extensive unilateral removal of hemispheral lobule VI in 11 rabbits impaired ipsilateral conditioned responses as reflected by reductions of 52% in mean frequency and 53% in mean amplitude during test trials on the first postoperative session. The decreases in the amplitude and frequency of conditioned responses were highly correlated (r = 0.82). The frequency of conditioned responses recovered to control levels but their amplitudes remained reduced such that the correlation between these two measures of responding was no longer significant by the 12th postoperative conditioning session. The decrease in the amplitude of conditioned responses was not accompanied by changes in onset latency or rise time. There was no significant impairment of conditioned responses in surgical controls and animals with only partial damage to hemispheral lobule VI. It was concluded that hemispheral lobule VI plays an important role in the regulation of motor centers in the brainstem so as to facilitate the initiation and optimum execution of the conditioned NM reflex. This cortical regulation of the conditioned NM response may contain learned elements; however, these cannot be resolved with lesion methods, nor has their existence been proven in this or other lesion studies. Nevertheless, the results of this study do demonstrate that the cerebellar cortex cannot be considered as the single locus necessary for NM conditioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8463840      PMCID: PMC6576702     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  23 in total

Review 1.  The role of interpositus nucleus in eyelid conditioned responses.

Authors:  J M Delgado-García; A Gruart
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 2.  Using eyeblink classical conditioning as a test of the functional consequences of exposure of the developing cerebellum to alcohol.

Authors:  John T Green
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2003 Jan-Mar

3.  Cerebellar cortex lesions prevent acquisition of conditioned eyelid responses.

Authors:  K S Garcia; P M Steele; M D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The cerebellum and red nucleus are not required for In vitro classical conditioning of the turtle abducens nerve response.

Authors:  C W Anderson; J Keifer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Purkinje cell loss by OX7-saporin impairs excitatory and inhibitory eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Brian C Nolan; John H Freeman
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  The p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase is involved in associative learning in rabbits.

Authors:  X Zhen; W Du; A G Romano; E Friedman; J A Harvey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Cerebellar cortex and eyeblink conditioning: bilateral regulation of conditioned responses.

Authors:  A Gruart; C H Yeo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Bilateral disruption of conditioned responses after unilateral blockade of cerebellar output in the decerebrate ferret.

Authors:  M Ivarsson; P Svensson; G Hesslow
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Localization of the cerebellar cortical zone mediating acquisition of eyeblink conditioning in rats.

Authors:  Adam B Steinmetz; John H Freeman
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  Functional MRI of cerebellar activity during eyeblink classical conditioning in children and adults.

Authors:  Dominic T Cheng; Ernesta M Meintjes; Mark E Stanton; John E Desmond; Mariska Pienaar; Neil C Dodge; John M Power; Christopher D Molteno; John F Disterhoft; Joseph L Jacobson; Sandra W Jacobson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.