Literature DB >> 24931828

Localization of the cerebellar cortical zone mediating acquisition of eyeblink conditioning in rats.

Adam B Steinmetz1, John H Freeman2.   

Abstract

Delay eyeblink conditioning is established by paired presentations of a conditioned stimulus (CS) such as a tone or light and an unconditioned stimulus (US) that elicits eyelid closure before training. The CS and US inputs converge on Purkinje cells in the cerebellar cortex. The cerebellar cortex plays a substantial role in acquisition of delay eyeblink conditioning in rabbits and rodents, but the specific area of the cortex that is necessary for acquisition in rodents has not been identified. A recent study identified an eyeblink microzone in the mouse cerebellar cortex at the base of the primary fissure (Heiney, Kim, Augustine, & Medina, 2014). There is no evidence that the cortex in this eyeblink microzone plays a role in rodent eyeblink conditioning but it is a good candidate region. Experiment 1 examined the effects of unilateral (ipsilateral to the US) lesions of lobule HVI, the lateral anterior lobe, or the base of the primary fissure on eyeblink conditioning in rats. Lesions of either the anterior lobe or lobule HVI impaired acquisition, but lesions of the base of the primary fissure produced the largest deficit. Experiment 2 used reversible inactivation with muscimol to demonstrate that inactivation of the putative eyeblink microzone severely impaired acquisition and had only a modest effect on retention of eyeblink conditioning. The findings indicate that the base of the primary fissure is the critical zone of the cerebellar cortex for acquisition of eyeblink conditioning in rats.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Associative learning; Cerebellar cortex; Cerebellum; Eyeblink conditioning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24931828      PMCID: PMC4143471          DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2014.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  31 in total

1.  Reversible lesions of the cerebellar interpositus nucleus during acquisition and retention of a classically conditioned behavior.

Authors:  R E Clark; A A Zhang; D G Lavond
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Disruption of classical eyelid conditioning after cerebellar lesions: damage to a memory trace system or a simple performance deficit?

Authors:  J E Steinmetz; D G Lavond; D Ivkovich; C G Logan; R F Thompson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Cerebellar cortex and eyeblink conditioning: a reexamination.

Authors:  C H Yeo; M J Hardiman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Reacquisition of classical conditioning after removal of cerebellar cortex.

Authors:  D G Lavond; J E Steinmetz; M H Yokaitis; R F Thompson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Initial localization of the memory trace for a basic form of learning.

Authors:  D A McCormick; G A Clark; D G Lavond; R F Thompson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Ipsilateral cerebellar lesions prevent learning of the classically conditioned nictitating membrane/eyelid response.

Authors:  J S Lincoln; D A McCormick; R F Thompson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-06-17       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit. I. Lesions of the cerebellar nuclei.

Authors:  C H Yeo; M J Hardiman; M Glickstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit. II. Lesions of the cerebellar cortex.

Authors:  C H Yeo; M J Hardiman; M Glickstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Acquisition of classical conditioning without cerebellar cortex.

Authors:  D G Lavond; J E Steinmetz
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1989-06-01       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Rabbit classically conditioned eyelid responses do not reappear after interpositus nucleus lesion and extensive post-lesion training.

Authors:  J E Steinmetz; S F Logue; S S Steinmetz
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1992-10-31       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  12 in total

1.  Bidirectional short-term plasticity during single-trial learning of cerebellar-driven eyelid movements in mice.

Authors:  Farzaneh Najafi; Javier F Medina
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  Intracerebellar cannabinoid administration impairs delay but not trace eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Adam B Steinmetz; John H Freeman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Cannabinoid modulation of memory consolidation within the cerebellum.

Authors:  Adam B Steinmetz; John H Freeman
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.877

4.  Cerebellar Premotor Output Neurons Collateralize to Innervate the Cerebellar Cortex.

Authors:  Brenda D Houck; Abigail L Person
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Intrinsic Excitability Increase in Cerebellar Purkinje Cells after Delay Eye-Blink Conditioning in Mice.

Authors:  Heather K Titley; Gabrielle V Watkins; Carmen Lin; Craig Weiss; Michael McCarthy; John F Disterhoft; Christian Hansel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Cannabinoid agonist administration within the cerebellar cortex impairs motor learning.

Authors:  Adam B Steinmetz; John H Freeman
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 2.877

7.  Amygdala Modulation of Cerebellar Learning.

Authors:  Sean J Farley; Jason J Radley; John H Freeman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Locomotor activity modulates associative learning in mouse cerebellum.

Authors:  Catarina Albergaria; N Tatiana Silva; Dominique L Pritchett; Megan R Carey
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Young Domestic Pigs (Sus scrofa) Can Perform Pavlovian Eyeblink Conditioning.

Authors:  Henk-Jan Boele; Sangyun Joung; Joanne E Fil; Austin T Mudd; Stephen A Fleming; Sebastiaan K E Koekkoek; Ryan N Dilger
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Impact of parallel fiber to Purkinje cell long-term depression is unmasked in absence of inhibitory input.

Authors:  Henk-Jan Boele; Saša Peter; Michiel M Ten Brinke; Lucas Verdonschot; Anna C H IJpelaar; Dimitris Rizopoulos; Zhenyu Gao; Sebastiaan K E Koekkoek; Chris I De Zeeuw
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.