Literature DB >> 9234206

Bilateral disruption of conditioned responses after unilateral blockade of cerebellar output in the decerebrate ferret.

M Ivarsson1, P Svensson, G Hesslow.   

Abstract

1. Lesions of the cerebellar cortex can abolish classically conditioned eyeblink responses, but some recovery with retraining has been observed. It has been suggested that the recovered responses are generated by the intact contralateral cerebellar hemisphere. In order to investigate this suggestion, bilaterally acquired conditioned responses were studied after the unilateral blockade of cerebellar output. 2. Decerebrate ferrets were trained with ipsilateral electrical forelimb stimulation (300 ms, 50 Hz, 1 mA) as the conditioned stimulus and bilaterally applied peri-orbital stimulation (40 ms, 50 Hz, 3 mA) as the unconditioned stimulus. The conditioned and unconditioned eyeblink responses were monitored by EMG recordings from the orbicularis oculi muscle. The output from one cerebellar hemisphere was blocked either by injecting small amounts of lignocaine (lidocaine; 0.5-1.0 microliter) into the brachium conjunctivum, or by a restricted mechanical lesion of the brainstem rostral to the cerebellum. 3. As described by previous investigators, the unilateral blockade of cerebellar output abolished ipsilateral conditioned responses. 4. More importantly, such blockade also abolished or strongly depressed contralateral conditioned responses. When mechanical lesions of the brachium conjunctivum were made, contralateral responses, in contrast to ipsilateral responses, recovered within 1-2.5 h. 5. When the unconditioned stimulus was removed on one side, causing extinction of conditioned responses on this side, conditioned responses were temporarily depressed on the trained side as well. 6. Unilateral interruption of cerebellar output had no clear effect on contralateral unconditioned reflex responses. 7. The results demonstrate that one cerebellar hemisphere in ferrets exerts a marked control of contralateral conditioned eyeblink responses, probably via premotor neurones involved specifically in conditioned, and not in unconditioned, responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9234206      PMCID: PMC1159581          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1997.189bl.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  34 in total

1.  [Facial reflexes].

Authors:  E KUGELBERG
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1952-09       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Cerebellar lesions and the nictitating membrane reflex: performance deficits of the conditioned and unconditioned response.

Authors:  J P Welsh; J A Harvey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The trigeminally evoked blink reflex. I. Neuronal circuits.

Authors:  J J Pellegrini; A K Horn; C Evinger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Reacquisition of classical conditioning after removal of cerebellar cortex.

Authors:  D G Lavond; J E Steinmetz; M H Yokaitis; R F Thompson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Neural mechanisms of the corneal blinking reflex in cats.

Authors:  M Hiraoka; M Shimamura
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1977-04-15       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit. I. Lesions of the cerebellar nuclei.

Authors:  C H Yeo; M J Hardiman; M Glickstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit. II. Lesions of the cerebellar cortex.

Authors:  C H Yeo; M J Hardiman; M Glickstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Inhibition of the inferior olive during conditioned responses in the decerebrate ferret.

Authors:  G Hesslow; M Ivarsson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Effects of lesions of cerebellar nuclei on conditioned behavioral and hippocampal neuronal responses.

Authors:  G A Clark; D A McCormick; D G Lavond; R F Thompson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1984-01-16       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Pharmacological analysis of the magnocellular red nucleus during classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response.

Authors:  D A Haley; R F Thompson; J Madden
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1988-06-28       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  5 in total

1.  fMRI of the conscious rabbit during unilateral classical eyeblink conditioning reveals bilateral cerebellar activation.

Authors:  Michael J Miller; Nan-kuei Chen; Limin Li; Brian Tom; Craig Weiss; John F Disterhoft; Alice M Wyrwicz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Intracellular correlates of acquisition and long-term memory of classical conditioning in Purkinje cell dendrites in slices of rabbit cerebellar lobule HVI.

Authors:  B G Schreurs; P A Gusev; D Tomsic; D L Alkon; T Shi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Examination of bilateral eyeblink conditioning in rats.

Authors:  Matthew M Campolattaro; John H Freeman
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 4.  Are Purkinje Cell Pauses Drivers of Classically Conditioned Blink Responses?

Authors:  Dan-Anders Jirenhed; Germund Hesslow
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Climbing Fiber Regulation of Spontaneous Purkinje Cell Activity and Cerebellum-Dependent Blink Responses(1,2,3).

Authors:  Riccardo Zucca; Anders Rasmussen; Fredrik Bengtsson
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2016-01-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.