Literature DB >> 8451531

Age-related differences in timing control of repetitive movement: application of the Wing-Kristofferson model.

L S Greene1, H G Williams.   

Abstract

Age differences in timing control were investigated in persons between 6 and 75 years. Subjects performed a repetitive finger-tapping task, attempting to match a 550-ms interresponse interval (IRI). Response variability was analyzed using the method of Wing-Kristofferson (1973). An autocovariance technique estimated the proportion of the overall (total) IRI variability contributed by central (clock) and peripheral implementation (motor delay) processes. Significant age and gender differences were revealed only for total and clock variability. Results indicated that (a) young children (6-7 years) had higher variances than all other age groups, (b) older children (9-10 years) were more variable than young and middle-age adults, (c) variances did not differ significantly across three adult age groups (21-75 years), and (d) males were less variable than females for all age groups. In agreement with recent investigations that have used the Wing-Kristofferson methodology, this study suggests that age-related differences in timing control are largely a function of central processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8451531     DOI: 10.1080/02701367.1993.10608776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport        ISSN: 0270-1367            Impact factor:   2.500


  8 in total

1.  Movement timing and cognitive control: adult-age differences in multi-tasking.

Authors:  Anne-Merel Meijer; Ralf T Krampe
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-06-17

2.  Self-paced timing detects and tracks change in prodromal Huntington disease.

Authors:  Kelly C Rowe; Jane S Paulsen; Douglas R Langbehn; Kevin Duff; Leigh J Beglinger; Chiachi Wang; Justin J F O'Rourke; Julie C Stout; David J Moser
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  The effects of Parkinson's disease and age on syncopated finger movements.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Stegemöller; Tanya Simuni; Colum D Mackinnon
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  The role of top-down control in different phases of a sensorimotor timing task: a DCM study of adults and adolescents.

Authors:  Suzanne T Witt; Michael C Stevens
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.978

5.  Timing of bimanual movements and deafferentation: implications for the role of sensory movement effects.

Authors:  Knut Drewing; Prisca Stenneken; Jonathan Cole; Wolfgang Prinz; Gisa Aschersleben
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis Study of Simple Motor Movements in Older and Young Adults.

Authors:  Ted K Turesky; Peter E Turkeltaub; Guinevere F Eden
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 5.750

7.  A Tablet-Based Assessment of Rhythmic Ability.

Authors:  Theodore P Zanto; Namita T Padgaonkar; Alex Nourishad; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-11-01

8.  Social context facilitates visuomotor synchrony and bonding in children and adults.

Authors:  Ellen M Howard; Danielle Ropar; Roger Newport; Bahar Tunçgenç
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.